Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly what is a mainline route? I fly the 200 into the same airports that mainline flies into. It's just a matter of time of day and passenger demand. I say that your theory holds no water.Its not a mainline " plane " but it flies on routes that should be mainline.... and for that matter, the CR700 and 900 too....
They care about jobs that are suppose to be mainline jobs... not what the plane looks like..
maybe they arent the ones who need to stop whining.
Cheers!
Its still an RJ... stop the b$tching already!
You guys really like flying an 86,000 pound airplane for 25 bucks an hour?
10 years ago the same size airplane was flown for 140 bucks an hour in the right seat. Why don't we start trying to make this a career that people strive to be in again instead of not being able to afford to do anything?
You guys really like flying an 86,000 pound airplane for 25 bucks an hour?
10 years ago the same size airplane was flown for 140 bucks an hour in the right seat. Why don't we start trying to make this a career that people strive to be in again instead of not being able to afford to do anything?
I played the game... the 53,000 pound jet I got hired into was a turboprop replacement. As times went on, I found myself flying 3+ hour legs in it. I knew something was wrong and the ball was rolling south faster and faster...then the bankruptcies came. Then the jumbo RJs came.
I guess it's all a matter of perspective. Some people flew 6 and 7 leg days in an unpressurized turbo prop in 100 degree heat of summer. 3+ hour legs sounds pretty good from the other perspective.
The regionals were intended to be a small aircraft operation and as a stepping stone to get to the big leagues....with the occassional career stop.
I guess some look at it that way. But, who made those rules--if they do exist?
I absolutely agree with who gave up scope, and everytime I saw it erode further, I saw my chances of making it to the big leagues grow slimmer and slimmer.
I totally agree with you on this one. That's why some of us got stuck.
Now that I'm there, I'm trying to make a difference. How about you?
Everytime an RJ gets delivered to your company, it will take you that much longer to get to your real goal when you started this career. Which is to fly mainline equipment.
Why do the mainline people really care about the 170/175 being a mainline plane so much?
10 years ago the same size airplane was flown for 140 bucks an hour in the right seat.
Why do the mainline people really care about the 170/175 being a mainline plane so much? It is the same thing as a crj900.
Is it because it has slides and engines under the wing?
Its still an RJ... stop the b$tching already!
You are all missing the origanal question. Why are they targeting the 170/175, but I havent seen any threads or websites about taking back or stapling the CR9, or even the CR2/7 for that matter.
It is the same old "only the airplanes that look worthy" syndrom.
You guys will never fix the problem unless you get all the RJs and large T-props back where they belong. And don't give me this crap about it being a "good start". That is so transparent.
Aren't you in your first year at DL, yet you always say 'we' like you're a manager of the company, and now you're saying I'm going to get scope back. I think that you really think you run DL. Good luck running the union and DL. How will you make all these changes when flying a 170 at Compass next year?Sir, simply put, you are dead wrong.
We have looked at it from a lot of sides. The quickest way to get this ball rolling is with CPZ and the E-jets. It is for legal reasons.
I know Joe Merchant will chime in here how the Ford-Cookseylawsuit helped save his RJ career, but it did a lot more damaging things.
See that lawsuit caused a lot of issues. Fact is that EV and OH fly the CRJ series. They were the ones that "benefited" from that lawsuit. They are represented by ALPA as DALPA is. We have a few more steps to get those 900's on property than we do with the E jets. It comes down to a representational issues.
We know for a fact that Joe's friend from OH will slap a lawsuit on DALPA/ALPA when we advance on their CRJ turf. We are aware. But, we will be working for those too.
It is not that it is an inferior product. The E-jet is more passenger friendly, but more costly to operate. So from a business perspective the CRJ makes a better business case for us. Just trust Peanuckle and I when we say we are doing everything we can do to do our part in brining back scope.
It will be a long road. But one we are willing to fight. They way I see it If you do not have a good section 1 then the rest of our CBA is not worth the paper it is written on.
Joe and his friends know there are people over here with good minds that are going to fight for this.
Aren't you in your first year at DL, yet you always say 'we' like you're a manager of the company, and now you're saying I'm going to get scope back. I think that you really think you run DL. Good luck running the union and DL. How will you make all these changes when flying a 170 at Compass next year?
Why do the mainline people really care about the 170/175 being a mainline plane so much? It is the same thing as a crj900.
Is it because it has slides and engines under the wing?
Its still an RJ... stop the b$tching already!
Because most mainline crews and frequent fliers don't like the CRJ Jets because they are so uncomfortable to be in for any length of time. Although small improvements came to the CRJ9700/900 - the CRJ brand has a bad reputation for passenger comfort (due to its design and shear numbers of CRJs flying out there over Embraer products).
The few 170/175/190s have much larger seats, leg room, and padding in the seat itself. Embraer made similar economical and ergonomical decisions when it designed the EMB135,140,145 series.
If you are a CRJ driver or whatever you fly- just ignore the comments. There is always going to be a plane that is better than yours.
You guys really like flying an 86,000 pound airplane for 25 bucks an hour?
10 years ago the same size airplane was flown for 140 bucks an hour in the right seat. Why don't we start trying to make this a career that people strive to be in again instead of not being able to afford to do anything?
How you interpret what I say is your deal. I find it funny that you think I am a manager or actively in the union. I just call it like I see it based on the info I have.
No I am not in first year.
You guys will never fix the problem unless you get all the RJs and large T-props back where they belong. And don't give me this crap about it being a "good start". That is so transparent.
You guys really like flying an 86,000 pound airplane for 25 bucks an hour?
10 years ago the same size airplane was flown for 140 bucks an hour in the right seat. Why don't we start trying to make this a career that people strive to be in again instead of not being able to afford to do anything?