I was gonna add to the thread, but, well put X-Rated! After several years on FI, finally someone put into words EXACTLY how it works!!! Or, how it SHOULD work!
7777, I know you say you're trying to learn from B19, but the above post from X-Rated is it in a nutshell.
If you go back and review B19's history of posts, you'll quickly see a pattern. Basically, every problem that every company faces is the union's fault.
No. That is not what I have ever stated. What I have clearly stated is that bringing a union into a company will not benefit the company and will place a company in jeapardy when the times get tough. I have stated that a union is not the fix all, and that unions restrict company growth and create turmoil from within, hence the statement "be careful what you ask for."
If you try to point out problems at companies that don't have unions, you'll only get silence from B19.
Every company has problems, but I have stated ad nauseum, that when problems appear at companies, those that have unions are unable to react quickly due to restrictive CBAs that limit growth and tamper with the business plan. As an example, how may times over the years have mergers been stopped or successful programs such as ASAP been torpedoed because of unions? All the time. Doesn't happen in non-union shops. I've used the example of cameras on the flight deck. Won't happen because of unions even though it's been a recomendation of the NTSB for years. Never get silence from me, but it's hard to respond to every single post I get in the short period of time I have when I log-in.
If you try to point out the main factors that cause company's problems that have unions (soaring fuel costs, costly govn't regs, competition from LCC's, etc....) he'll ignore those and STILL blame the unions for all those company's woes. It's always the evil unions that won't bend.
I blame unions for the inability for a company to adjust it's business plan due to a CBA. All air carriers have operating certificates and pilots. Those that have unions bear higher costs and don't have the ability to adjust to the market place and economy.
Of course, B19 absolutely will not address why workers' contracts should be voided or altered during hard times, but management should have their contracts honored, right up to and including huge bonuses, even if the company goes under. Shows you how much he really values the worker.
Once again, I've addressed this many times. First, it's well known what Grinstein did, but even more than that, a contract offered by the board to a CEO is not the same as one that is negotiated by a union. A CEO is offered a contract to attract a qualified person and retain their services in order to best serve and run the company. A union contract doesn't and isn't negotatied that way.
I'm glad you're keeping an open mind. And I will openly admit that a union is not necessarily the answer to every problem encountered by workers at a company. But start reviewing B19's posts, and periodically re-read X-rated's post above, and you'll see there isn't much to be learned from B19. He truly believes management are the only ones who can make a company work.
Once again, ad nauseum. I have constantly stated, if you are not happy with management, go be one and get off your butt. If you are smart enough to hold the company hostage and bring a union onto the property, you must also be smart enough to enter the world of management and fix the perception of what is wrong. I've seen many chief pilots (that were radical union supporters) come off the line and discover it's just not that easy and turn their backs on the union once the reality sets in.
And they are responsible for everything. Of course, if I taxi into the grass or mud, I wonder who in management is responsible? Whose career is on the line? Hint: it's not who B19 would like you to believe it is (management).
Thanks X-Rated!! for one of the finest and best worded posts I've seen on FI. In two paragraphs it says everything I think most of us have been trying to get across for a long time!