Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Which regional will be gone 1st? Mesa or Xjet

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Its always entertaining to discuss all the rumors and what ifs that pop up on the forums.

Anyways, it doesn't matter what the reverend thinks. If the PILOTS (ALPA and Teamsters) cannot come to an agreement on fair and equitable, then it goes to binding arbitration. Again, its all spelled out clearly in the XJT contract.

not only the XJT contract but Federal law also thanks to congress.
 
Yeah, just ask the TWA FA's how "fair and equitable" worked out for them...

That was before the federal law that was signed by the president which would prevent such a thing. Again, my point is that BB would have NO say in it. It would be between the pilots or an arbitrator.
 
that was the previous offer from Skypest, remember? We would love to have that now. Oh well, hindsight is 20/20.

I know, but what does that have anything to do with this thread? And why would we (pilots) want that anyways? What does it matter to we (pilots) how many millions a few institutional investors would make in the deal?
 
Pope BB has said very clearly that RAH has NO interest in ExJet. Let em go...

Just like he publicly stated he was not interested in 50 seat flying then

BAMN!!!!!!!

50 seat Crj flying for Continental.
 
If it's a merger then something should be worked out. If it's an all out purchase, then the conquering nation has right to do what they choose. Those are just the rules. I hope neither happens though. I also hope XJT hangs in there and continues to provide excellent lift.


Actually, Allegheny/Mohawk would govern the "conquering nation". The law has changed.
 
Actually, Allegheny/Mohawk would govern the "conquering nation". The law has changed.

RAH pilots will be screaming for staple then

Sucks but the truth hurts
 
You guys do know McNugget is not an RAH pilot, right?
 
that was the previous offer from Skypest, remember? We would love to have that now. Oh well, hindsight is 20/20.

Not really. As it is now, 300+ furloughs and 125+ downgrades, but 7 more years with CAL. And that sucks.

Had they taken the offer, in a year it would be, oh, I don't know. Around 2800 furloughs. Remember?
 
i know i dont speak for all RAH pilots, but "date of hire" with equipment fences would be ok with me. i would never vote for staple. last thing we need is more internal strife.
 
What about us poor slobs on the 145. These equipment fences would protect you on your mainline aircraft, but we would get hosed. That certainly is not "fair and equitable." I could've gone to Xjt I suppose, but I didn't like where their business was headed. Looks like I chose rightly as I would've been furloughed anyway. It would be a kick in the nuts for us to BUY XJT and then have to integrate by date of hire all because they chose poorly in their business plan. I don't know why I am even still talking on this thread, because even though there is a chance of us buying XJT, I don't think it's going to happen.
 
Last edited:
would everyone please just do a quick search on this
idiot's recent posts. you'll see he's just stirring the pot b/c he's got nothing better to do.
 
would everyone please just do a quick search on this
idiot's recent posts. you'll see he's just stirring the pot b/c he's got nothing better to do.

I found a picture of you, at your side-job, you sick bastard. Stay away from my family, or the last thing you'll see is a bullet between the eyes.
 
What about us poor slobs on the 145. These equipment fences would protect you on your mainline aircraft, but we would get hosed. That certainly is not "fair and equitable." I could've gone to Xjt I suppose, but I didn't like where their business was headed. Looks like I chose rightly as I would've been furloughed anyway. It would be a kick in the nuts for us to BUY XJT and then have to integrate by date of hire all because they chose poorly in their business plan. I don't know why I am even still talking on this thread, because even though there is a chance of us buying XJT, I don't think it's going to happen.

Ok then just do a ratio seniority integration.;)
 
I have just wasted 10 minutes of my life reading this thread. If I ever find out who any of you are, especially McNugget, Capt. Morgan, or CX880, I can promise you I will get my 10 minutes back.....

box
 
I have just wasted 10 minutes of my life reading this thread. If I ever find out who any of you are, especially McNugget, Capt. Morgan, or CX880, I can promise you I will get my 10 minutes back.....

box

Why me? I think I had an honest to goodness arguement! :beer:
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom