Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Trans States downgrades and furloughs - Again...

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Fair enough, however there are those out there that believe TSA pilots should have voted yes on the matter and worked out the details later. That would have at least ensure the future of the company and more importantly the flying. Look at where TSA is now. Both sides have a point. There are no airlines out there that currently fly 70+ seaters for below 70 seat wages. I have no idea how long that would have gone with TSA if they voted yes.

And by the way GOJET in no shape or form has offered jobs for furloughed TSA pilots, guys are going there on their own will.

You and merchant are classless. Find someplace else to work out whatever issues you're struggling with. This thread is about men and women who are losing their jobs, not your misunderstanding of the situation at an airline you apparently know nothing about.
 
You and merchant are classless. Find someplace else to work out whatever issues you're struggling with. This thread is about men and women who are losing their jobs, not your misunderstanding of the situation at an airline you apparently know nothing about.

Let's not call each other names. All I am saying is that the pilots and the mec should have been smarter then to put up a fight with repeated NOs. Yes and they should have worked out the deal later, Hulas knew he wasn't going to cut it with 50 seat pay on CRJ7s. Look at current contracts, no one flys 70 seaters for 50 seat pay. If you were a sweatshop owner in INDIA, would you care if your employees votes yes or no on a matter that would further increased your capital and the company?

No, the fact is that all the BS with alpa was a formality, Hulas was going to form it anyways either with the help of the pilots or with ought. A yes vote would have been better for the company as you can see what has happened the last few years and especially now.

Not only has GJ become what seems like a better operation but they have even got better pay and a contract. And are adding to their fleet.
 
Let's not call each other names. All I am saying is that the pilots and the mec should have been smarter then to put up a fight with repeated NOs. Yes and they should have worked out the deal later, Hulas knew he wasn't going to cut it with 50 seat pay on CRJ7s. Look at current contracts, no one flys 70 seaters for 50 seat pay. If you were a sweatshop owner in INDIA, would you care if your employees votes yes or no on a matter that would further increased your capital and the company?

No, the fact is that all the BS with alpa was a formality, Hulas was going to form it anyways either with the help of the pilots or with ought. A yes vote would have been better for the company as you can see what has happened the last few years and especially now.

Not only has GJ become what seems like a better operation but they have even got better pay and a contract. And are adding to their fleet.

You obviously don't know what you're talking about, but I'm not arguing with you here, I'm ~telling~ you: you are classless. This is not the venue for you to let your ignorance shine; start your own thread. It is ruthlessly insensitive to try to argue with people who have lost their jobs that they are to blame, and for no reason other than to see yourself in print. To do so is both pathetic and classless.
 
It is ruthlessly insensitive to try to argue with people who have lost their jobs that they are to blame, and for no reason other than to see yourself in print. To do so is both pathetic and classless.

Uh... I've lost my job. See "my current position" And I'm not arguing with people who lost their jobs.:mad:

See myself in print?
 
Last edited:
Did the pilots not vote against the TA? You had a chance to bring everything under one list.....Actions have consequences.......

you, buddy, are a ****************************** bag.

its called having self-respect and integrity. I would have voted no too.
 
Does anyone know:

How far back did they just recently furlough?

What planes are being lost to mexico?

What are the anticipated furloughs when the eagle planes go?

Info is appreciated.

Thanks,
JC
 
Fair enough, however there are those out there that believe TSA pilots should have voted yes on the matter and worked out the details later. That would have at least ensure the future of the company and more importantly the flying. Look at where TSA is now. Both sides have a point. There are no airlines out there that currently fly 70+ seaters for below 70 seat wages. I have no idea how long that would have gone with TSA if they voted yes.

And by the way GOJET in no shape or form has offered jobs for furloughed TSA pilots, guys are going there on their own will.

If we would have voted yes you would still be on the street right now. The letter allowed all furloughs to happen via equipment type not total senority so since you fly the EMB you would have been gone since we are getting rid of EMBs... I've read your posts before and I'm ashamed that you are TSA.
 
Does anyone know:

How far back did they just recently furlough?

What planes are being lost to mexico?

What are the anticipated furloughs when the eagle planes go?

Info is appreciated.

Thanks,
JC

1. Feb 06 DOH for downgrades
Aug 07 DOH for furloughs.

2. Not sure but heard that 5 are going to Mexico. 10 are going back to Eagle, and 2 are going back to the leasing company so thats 17 planes which I've heard is the exact number of planes we have on the AA side.

3. Well 10 planes should be about another 50 downgrades and 100 furloughs. 50 downgrades already announced in 2 waves plus the 50 from the Eagle planes plus the 20 from the 2 planes going to the leasing company should be about 120 downgrades. And the 103 furloughs already announced plus the 100 from the eagle planes and the 40 from the leasing company planes should make a total of about 243 furloughs.
 
Thanks corny!

I'm an exwaterskier and I have many friends over there. I was just trying to figure out how they will be impacted. Peace!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top