MountainFreak
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2006
- Posts
- 101
Prisoners of War are uniformed soldiers from sovereign nations. As an example, spies are not considered POWs under the Geneva Convention. Although they are from sovereign nations, they are not "uniformed soldiers" and have different rights under the Geneva Convention. Terrorists are also not afforded the same rights as POWs as they are not uniformed OR from sovereign nations. Do you and Max see the difference between a Terrorist and a Prisoner of War? You need to be more clear when arguing the point.
By the way, I agree with the Supreme Court Justice writing the desenting opinion regarding the right of terrorists to have legal representation that was recently decided; "that decision WILL result in the death of more Americans"
You are missing the point. I don't believe a terrorist should be afforded any quarter, execute them all for all I care. I have helped in the bombing of a few myself. I see from your profile you've probably been even closer in doing the same.
The point is you need a mechanism to show you aren't the terrorist that the government says you are. Many of the gitmo detainees are hardened criminals and terrorists. Others were just farmers caught in the wrong place and time. And what about my example of a US citizen wrongly designated as an enemy combatant. It isn't far fetched.
As to your point about the death of more Americans. I don't know, maybe? But when did Americans become such pu$$ees regarding their core rights? The Patriots in 1776 said Live Free or Die. It wasn't a slogan, they meant it literally.
Today, people give up those very same rights on the hypothetical outside chance something bad might happen. We are a nation of wimps now, and the "tough" right wingers are leading the way.
Last edited: