Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

To ALL UNITED pilots courtesy of ALL UAX carriers and their pilots

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

bmpilot2003

Registered Donor
Joined
Jul 7, 2003
Posts
397
Important Letter to United Pilots

June 30, 2008

To United Airlines pilots:
On behalf of the Jumpseat Committees representing all of the carriers flying as United Express, welcome
aboard. Unfortunately, this letter has been provided to you because you will likely be affected by a
difficult decision, reluctantly arrived at by the United Express (UAX) pilots. Over the last couple of
years, United Airlines (UAL) has made changes to the gate jumpseating and priority software programs.

Several of these changes have adversely affected not only the UAX pilots, but also the UAL pilots, as
well. There is widespread confusion and frustration amongst many of the pilots regarding how the gate
computer sorts priorities for jumpseat requests. Based upon the UAX agreement tables, jumpseat requests on UAX flights are supposed to be processed like this:
1. On their own flights, UAX pilots are sorted first, in order of their seniority.
2. UAL pilots and “other” UAX pilots are sorted next, in order of their check-in.
3. Non UAL/UAX pilots (“offline pilots”) are then sorted, in order of their check-in.

HOWEVER, the current software being used by UAL does NOT sort jumpseat requests in this order.
Instead, all jumpseat requests are sorted as if the flight were a mainline UAL flight. This means that
UAX pilots are being bumped by UAL pilots on their own UAX flights. The computer software also sorts
some UAX pilots as if they were offline pilots, even on their own flights. Despite nine (9) months of
repeated appeals to UAL management, and despite the fact that a minor software change would solve this issue (simply change the computers to recognize the carriers’ flight number) UAX carriers have recently been told that UAL will not fix this blatant degradation of our jumpseat agreements because to do so would not generate revenue for UAL. This position is untenable.We have now sent a detailed letter to UALPA’s MEC, addressing these very important issues, and we have provided UALPA with specific examples of where UAL has made non-revenue generating changes to the gate software. The UAX pilots have respectfully requested that the gate jumpseat software be fixed within thirty (30) days. Regrettably, if UAL does not fix the jumpseat software within thirty (30) days,
UAX pilots will be left with no other choice but to deny all UAL pilots any requests for the jumpseat,
regardless of aircraft tail-colors beginning 07/31/08.
On behalf of all UAX pilots, we sincerely hope that we will not be forced to deny any UAL pilot a ride, as we are mindful of the fact that many UAL pilots will be negatively impacted. To that end, we are simply asking that you immediately call or email your MEC to let them know how important your UAX commute is, and to help us all obtain a fair and just resolution. Thank you for your professionalism and active cooperation.


Signed, the pilots of:
Chautauqua Airlines
Colgan Airlines
Go Jets Airlines
Mesa Air Group
Shuttle America
SkyWest Airlines






The last thing we want is to deny jump seats. We just want the problem fixed.
 
Last edited:
Why do they give 30 day notice but list a date 2 months away?

We just got a correction to the letter with the date corrected to 07/31/08. I hope the letter they sent to the UAL MEC had the correct date to begin with.

I hope this issue is resolved quickly. There are too many other pressing issues on the table these days.
 
Gee, if they're this mad over this, wait till the UA guys start flowing back to the LEFT SEAT of those little jets!!

Not the way to fix a problem guys.
 
It won't.

Do you think for a second UAL MGMT gives a sh!t weather or not they fix this?

Threats of a jumpseat war are NO WAY to fix it. Mgmt eats this stuff up.

It's right out of Divide and conquor 101. That's all they seem to teach in MBA programs now. God knows they sure as hell don't teach leadership.
 
....If this letter gets the situation rectified....Is it still stupid?
Yes it is stupid. The jumpseat agreements were always between pilot groups. The problem the express carriers are having is with UAL management. (by the way who is not having problems with UAL management.)

Holding a jumpseat agreement hostage for political purposes opens a huge can of worms.
 
Gee, if they're this mad over this, wait till the UA guys start flowing back to the LEFT SEAT of those little jets!!

Not the way to fix a problem guys.


Then please tell everyone what is the way to fix this.
This is the only way the UAL pilots will listen and trust me they will listen and It will get fixed!
 
thats cool...then express carriers deny pilots. express carrier pilots get denied on ual. there are always back ups to ual, but not always back ups to express.
 
Bottom line is that UAX pilots are getting kicked off their own jumpseat. That doesn't sound right.

They've been trying to fix this problem for a long time.
 
Too bad there are more express flights to more domestic destinations than their are UAL flights to domestic destinations. Seems that more UAL pilots will get stuck not getting home from work than express pilots. Enjoy your arrogance and no thanks for not trying to help us out. Hope Bobby understands why your not at his baseball game.
 
Yes it is stupid. The jumpseat agreements were always between pilot groups. The problem the express carriers are having is with UAL management. (by the way who is not having problems with UAL management.)

Holding a jumpseat agreement hostage for political purposes opens a huge can of worms.

First of all you are making wild ass assumptions you know nothing about. United management changed the jump seat priority to something different than what is stated in the jump seat agreement. Why has is gone this far? Because UAALPA has agreed to the change by management and told our jump seat committee that they will not pursue and fix the problem. This is not only a problem with Management but UAAPLA to. They have choosen not to honor the agreement.

Stan why do you even comment on this? You obviously know nothing about the situation.
 
Enjoy your arrogance.

Arrogance? Hello pot, this is kettle! Denying UAL pilots a jumpseat will not fix this. I was a JS Chair for 5 years at another carrier and we had a similar problem with our express folks, albeit much smaller.

Teamwork between them and us fixed it, not a divisive tactic like starting this nonsense. There will be NO WINNERS here....

What is happeneing is not right, I agree. However, UA Mgmt could care less about it. We have a commutter clause and I will gladly use it and stay home or have the CO get me a BP1-Pos space pass (which they will do to crew a trip).

There has to be a better way. I feel for you guys and what you are saying is right but this method for a fix is wrong.
 
It won't.

Do you think for a second UAL MGMT gives a sh!t weather or not they fix this?

Threats of a jumpseat war are NO WAY to fix it. Mgmt eats this stuff up.

It's right out of Divide and conquor 101. That's all they seem to teach in MBA programs now. God knows they sure as hell don't teach leadership.

The only people being divisive are the UAALPA MEC. By the way the Express Carriers were told by UA management go talk to the UA MEC and they said they would not change it.
 
I love how everyone says that jumpseat agreements are between pilot groups, but it is the company that actually forms the agreements. If I'm a UAX pilot and get bumped by a mainline on my own company, and that pilot accepts it and doesn't walk away right then and there, then my beef is with UAL, pilot group and company.

Where is the professionalism to give up a jumpseat to the guy on his own company? You can't say it's one and not the other, it's a package deal.
 
First of all you are making wild ass assumptions you know nothing about. United management changed the jump seat priority to something different than what is stated in the jump seat agreement. Why has is gone this far? Because UAALPA has agreed to the change by management and told our jump seat committee that they will not pursue and fix the problem. This is not only a problem with Management but UAAPLA to. They have choosen not to honor the agreement.

Stan why do you even comment on this? You obviously know nothing about the situation.

I've been involved at another carrier that had a bunch of pilots that wanted to deny Skywest pilots the jumpseat after there union vote. That would have been stupid also.
 
I've been involved at another carrier that had a bunch of pilots that wanted to deny Skywest pilots the jumpseat after there union vote. That would have been stupid also.

Well, yeah, THAT would've been denying the jumpseat for political purposes, which ALPA and most other unions clearly condemn. This is about keeping true reciprocity in place. I don't know whether it'll be counterproductive but it's pretty justifiable in my opinion, and from what I hear the UAX guys have exhausted all other options.
 
Well, yeah, THAT would've been denying the jumpseat for political purposes, which ALPA and most other unions clearly condemn. This is about keeping true reciprocity in place. I don't know whether it'll be counterproductive but it's pretty justifiable in my opinion, and from what I hear the UAX guys have exhausted all other options.

Act like captains.
 
The fact is, mainline pilots feel as though they own the regional seats....Both in back and in the cockpit....For years Delta has tried to get priority on Connection seats....

Looks like the regional folks are getting fed up with that entitlement attitude....

It would not surprise be one bit if the United MEC likes the current situation and won't push to change it unless something like this is done....
 
I've been involved at another carrier that had a bunch of pilots that wanted to deny Skywest pilots the jumpseat after there union vote. That would have been stupid also.

What part of agreement is hard for you to comprehend? The computer system was changed to give UAL pilots #1 priority on UAX carriers. This goes against the agreement and the UAALPA MEC supports that. So much for the agreement.

This has nothing to do with unions.
 
First of all you are making wild ass assumptions you know nothing about. United management changed the jump seat priority to something different than what is stated in the jump seat agreement. Why has is gone this far? Because UAALPA has agreed to the change by management and told our jump seat committee that they will not pursue and fix the problem. This is not only a problem with Management but UAAPLA to. They have choosen not to honor the agreement.

Stan why do you even comment on this? You obviously know nothing about the situation.


By the way Stan i misspoke here UAALPA made the change and UAL management supported the change. Hows that for hypocrisy?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom