Nu,
ALPA looked at a SCP. The loss of the SCP at GoJets (which should have been a win) provided a strong indication that a SCP would not be successful for ASA. Delta's pilots were against it, politically.
Back to the topic.
My understanding is that the contract and the SLI are linked inasmuch as the contract will require our agreement to SLI methodology (negotiation, arbitration framework).
It would be my preference to have complete information to base a decision on, but I think we will deliberately be kept in the dark until after events have made an attempt to fight the SLI impossible.
It will be interesting to see what comes out of these joint negotiations. There are several priority items for the NWA MEC that I hope they (we) get.
Heyas Fins,
Well, that's where you went wrong (at ASA). Who CARES what the DAL pilots thought (at the time). You take up an assessment, you hire some sharks, and you pursue the SCP DESPITE what ALPA or what other pilot groups think. You do what's in YOUR best interests. The time to have fought that battle was long before GoJets was even around. It SHOULD have been filed the day ASA was purchased by DAL.
But, that's water under the bridge.
Back to the joint contract. Both pilot groups get to vote on it. From what I understand, there are goodies from both sides, and DAL pilots will certainly have sweeteners, otherwise what's your motivation for ratifying it?
Seriously, you guys need to decide what LOA 19 is. Either it was a safety net (like what the "official" dalpa position says it is) and only a stop on the way to better things via a joint contract (which seems to be in progress) OR it is negotiating leverage against NWA pilots in an SLI, which is what you seem to want it to be.
Which is it?
Nu