General Lee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Posts
- 20,442
If you only knew...
...anything.
Thanks Dad. Time to go back in the sims where YOU can control the outcome.....(not in real life though)
Bye Bye--General Lee
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you only knew...
...anything.
General, I know you like to "ride" some of the guys from time to time, but I have the highest regard for Occam. We might disagree on certain things, but I respect his opinions, although I don't always agree, and consider him one of the most informed and level headed posters on FI. Just my 2 cents.
Grow Up.
I have two dads now? Thanks MOM.........
Bye Bye--General Lee
General, FDJ2 and Occam are two of the sharper and more informed posters on the forum- Occam especially. Time to go have a beer in Vienna and step away from the laptop.
For a sim guy, he sure does know a lot... And, he has a great grasp of verbage. He probably scored an 800 on his Verbal SAT 30 years ago.....sooo impressive.
Bye Bye--General Lee
It amazes me how the Delta pilot membership just fall in line to whatever rhetoric the MEC and Moak feeds them, without any concrete data of the long term implications of what they are voting on.
Accepting a contract without SLI with NWA will only repeat what DAL did to Pan Am and NWA did to Republic. It sends an elitist message that "Your fellow colleagues are are not good enough to fit in your shoes". There will be a harboring of great animosity and it will last decades.
The data I am reading from the NWA MEC is troubling. DAL presents us with a seniority ratio of 8:5. When you do the math, you don't even have enough pilots on the property to make that work. There would be a vacancy at the bottom and any DAL new hire would be above an NWA pilot already on the list! Amazing. Do you think we do not know how to add?
DAL also includes in their ratio the equipment you have on order and options yet do not want to include NWAs orders or options? Unbelievable.
We offer fences, you'll have none of it, you want all your pilots at the top even though nearly a 1/3rd of our group will retire in the next 10 years, fine, we offer a dynamic seniority, Moak says no way. DAL offers is own variation of dynamic seniority yet is unwilling to provide any analysis on how it came to its conclusions. Moak says the same thing over and over "Just sign the agreement, you'll be happy". I am not kidding.
When I read in the WSJ on Moak's response to NWA request for arbitration, he said "That an arbitrator would be abdication of leadership". Is he serious? Leadership? He demonstrates anything but leadership. A "take it or leave it" approach, no analysis proposals, a love of the limelight and the camera's is a dangerous combination for a Union leader to take and one that will NEVER have my vote of confidence.
It amazes me how the Delta pilot membership just fall in line to whatever rhetoric the MEC and Moak feeds them, without any concrete data of the long term implications of what they are voting on.
Accepting a contract without SLI with NWA will only repeat what DAL did to Pan Am and NWA did to Republic. It sends an elitist message that "Your fellow colleagues are are not good enough to fit in your shoes". There will be a harboring of great animosity and it will last decades.
The data I am reading from the NWA MEC is troubling. DAL presents us with a seniority ratio of 8:5. When you do the math, you don't even have enough pilots on the property to make that work. There would be a vacancy at the bottom and any DAL new hire would be above an NWA pilot already on the list! Amazing. Do you think we do not know how to add?
DAL also includes in their ratio the equipment you have on order and options yet do not want to include NWAs orders or options? Unbelievable.
We offer fences, you'll have none of it, you want all your pilots at the top even though nearly a 1/3rd of our group will retire in the next 10 years, fine, we offer a dynamic seniority, Moak says no way. DAL offers is own variation of dynamic seniority yet is unwilling to provide any analysis on how it came to its conclusions. Moak says the same thing over and over "Just sign the agreement, you'll be happy". I am not kidding.
When I read in the WSJ on Moak's response to NWA request for arbitration, he said "That an arbitrator would be abdication of leadership". Is he serious? Leadership? He demonstrates anything but leadership. A "take it or leave it" approach, no analysis proposals, a love of the limelight and the camera's is a dangerous combination for a Union leader to take and one that will NEVER have my vote of confidence.
General, FDJ2 and Occam are two of the sharper and more informed posters on the forum- Occam especially. Time to go have a beer in Vienna and step away from the laptop.
GL, don't know about DAL, but at NWA all Sim instructors are regular line pukes, and still fly the line. Occam has been a LEC Chairman, instructs, and flies the line. We don't always agree on politics, and but he's definitely someone you'd want as a wingman when the going gets rough - can anyone say that about you?
Who would I want as a friend or a wingman?GL, don't know about DAL, but at NWA all Sim instructors are regular line pukes, and still fly the line. Occam has been a LEC Chairman, instructs, and flies the line. We don't always agree on politics, and but he's definitely someone you'd want as a wingman when the going gets rough - can anyone say that about you?
Probably not somebody that:
Has 10000 posts on flightinfo
Has multiple usernames with thousands of posts
Argues and debates people using these other usernames (And is serious about it)
Blames other companies for his own employers faults
Brags about International flying layovers while putting other folks down for domestic layovers
Is demeaning to regional pilots and others trying to make a living.
Makes claims about his wife being a VP and how sucessfull he is and how much money he makes:laugh:, while he spits in other peoples faces here (Jetblue, SWA etc.....) then claims he is debating for fun.
It goes on and on and on on.
Absolutely pathetic.
In fact I know who he is.
General Lee,
Step away from the desk, unplug the AC Adaptor and head outside and have a nice cold beer. Life is good.
I think we will have a joint agreement by Friday and we will all be drinking the Delta Kool-aid real soon. Any one got some vodka I can spike it with. These guys are way too uptight! Loosen up. Maybe undo that top button that seems to be hitting critical mass and acting as a projectile in the terminal!
All in fun.
ONE AIRLILNE ONE CONTRACT
What about Compass? Still gonna allow that alter ego operation to continue?
I'm sure the Delta execs are tipping their champagne glasses with big smiles on their faces.
Step away from the koolaid. Don't worry, everyone will be pissed at the seniority arbitration. That is what mergers are about.
See what I mean. "Everything is going to be ok" they say it over and over. Stunning.
This comes from a group that eliminated their FOQA and NASAP programs, has a computer bidding system 3 generations old, and has set the standard for the giveaways in scope language.
See what I mean. "Everything is going to be ok" they say it over and over. Stunning.
This comes from a group that eliminated their FOQA and NASAP programs, has a computer bidding system 3 generations old, and has set the standard for the giveaways in scope language.
You're joking right?!? You really want to compare NWA Scope to DAL's? How many 76 seaters does DAL have to park if they park the DC9's? How many 76 seaters can DAL get for every additional mainline a/c? Hmmmmmmm?I thought Compass set the standard for scope giveaway. Let's not be too hasty on a joint contract. I hoping for a lot more than the previously negotiated deal if we have to live with it for at least 4 years. The 100 seat replacement needs to be addressed in the contract. The company can not be allowed to merge then shrink the bottom of the list.
Why would anyone drop their FOQA Program?
You're joking right?!? You really want to compare NWA Scope to DAL's? How many 76 seaters does DAL have to park if they park the DC9's? How many 76 seaters can DAL get for every additional mainline a/c? Hmmmmmmm?
We use it in a positive way. The results of standarized approaches and consistant performance allow for insurance rates WELL below the industry average and identify areas to be addressed in initial and annual training.
DAL doesn't have DC-9s.
What are the weight restrictions on NWA 76 seaters, what are the weight restrictions on DAL 76 seaters?
Luckily, DAL pilots have adopted the lower cap of NALPA's RJ limits. NALPA would have allowed NWA 90 76 seaters, DALPA reduced that number to 55 once DAL completes the acquisition.
Excellent, thanks for the info.NALPA would have allowed NWA 90 76 seaters, DALPA reduced that number to 55 once DAL completes the acquisition.