General Lee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Posts
- 20,442
If you only knew...
...anything.
Thanks Dad. Time to go back in the sims where YOU can control the outcome.....(not in real life though)
Bye Bye--General Lee
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you only knew...
...anything.
General, I know you like to "ride" some of the guys from time to time, but I have the highest regard for Occam. We might disagree on certain things, but I respect his opinions, although I don't always agree, and consider him one of the most informed and level headed posters on FI. Just my 2 cents.
Grow Up.
I have two dads now? Thanks MOM.........
Bye Bye--General Lee
General, FDJ2 and Occam are two of the sharper and more informed posters on the forum- Occam especially. Time to go have a beer in Vienna and step away from the laptop.
For a sim guy, he sure does know a lot... And, he has a great grasp of verbage. He probably scored an 800 on his Verbal SAT 30 years ago.....sooo impressive.
Bye Bye--General Lee
It amazes me how the Delta pilot membership just fall in line to whatever rhetoric the MEC and Moak feeds them, without any concrete data of the long term implications of what they are voting on.
Accepting a contract without SLI with NWA will only repeat what DAL did to Pan Am and NWA did to Republic. It sends an elitist message that "Your fellow colleagues are are not good enough to fit in your shoes". There will be a harboring of great animosity and it will last decades.
The data I am reading from the NWA MEC is troubling. DAL presents us with a seniority ratio of 8:5. When you do the math, you don't even have enough pilots on the property to make that work. There would be a vacancy at the bottom and any DAL new hire would be above an NWA pilot already on the list! Amazing. Do you think we do not know how to add?
DAL also includes in their ratio the equipment you have on order and options yet do not want to include NWAs orders or options? Unbelievable.
We offer fences, you'll have none of it, you want all your pilots at the top even though nearly a 1/3rd of our group will retire in the next 10 years, fine, we offer a dynamic seniority, Moak says no way. DAL offers is own variation of dynamic seniority yet is unwilling to provide any analysis on how it came to its conclusions. Moak says the same thing over and over "Just sign the agreement, you'll be happy". I am not kidding.
When I read in the WSJ on Moak's response to NWA request for arbitration, he said "That an arbitrator would be abdication of leadership". Is he serious? Leadership? He demonstrates anything but leadership. A "take it or leave it" approach, no analysis proposals, a love of the limelight and the camera's is a dangerous combination for a Union leader to take and one that will NEVER have my vote of confidence.
It amazes me how the Delta pilot membership just fall in line to whatever rhetoric the MEC and Moak feeds them, without any concrete data of the long term implications of what they are voting on.
Accepting a contract without SLI with NWA will only repeat what DAL did to Pan Am and NWA did to Republic. It sends an elitist message that "Your fellow colleagues are are not good enough to fit in your shoes". There will be a harboring of great animosity and it will last decades.
The data I am reading from the NWA MEC is troubling. DAL presents us with a seniority ratio of 8:5. When you do the math, you don't even have enough pilots on the property to make that work. There would be a vacancy at the bottom and any DAL new hire would be above an NWA pilot already on the list! Amazing. Do you think we do not know how to add?
DAL also includes in their ratio the equipment you have on order and options yet do not want to include NWAs orders or options? Unbelievable.
We offer fences, you'll have none of it, you want all your pilots at the top even though nearly a 1/3rd of our group will retire in the next 10 years, fine, we offer a dynamic seniority, Moak says no way. DAL offers is own variation of dynamic seniority yet is unwilling to provide any analysis on how it came to its conclusions. Moak says the same thing over and over "Just sign the agreement, you'll be happy". I am not kidding.
When I read in the WSJ on Moak's response to NWA request for arbitration, he said "That an arbitrator would be abdication of leadership". Is he serious? Leadership? He demonstrates anything but leadership. A "take it or leave it" approach, no analysis proposals, a love of the limelight and the camera's is a dangerous combination for a Union leader to take and one that will NEVER have my vote of confidence.
General, FDJ2 and Occam are two of the sharper and more informed posters on the forum- Occam especially. Time to go have a beer in Vienna and step away from the laptop.
GL, don't know about DAL, but at NWA all Sim instructors are regular line pukes, and still fly the line. Occam has been a LEC Chairman, instructs, and flies the line. We don't always agree on politics, and but he's definitely someone you'd want as a wingman when the going gets rough - can anyone say that about you?
Who would I want as a friend or a wingman?GL, don't know about DAL, but at NWA all Sim instructors are regular line pukes, and still fly the line. Occam has been a LEC Chairman, instructs, and flies the line. We don't always agree on politics, and but he's definitely someone you'd want as a wingman when the going gets rough - can anyone say that about you?
Probably not somebody that:
Has 10000 posts on flightinfo
Has multiple usernames with thousands of posts
Argues and debates people using these other usernames (And is serious about it)
Blames other companies for his own employers faults
Brags about International flying layovers while putting other folks down for domestic layovers
Is demeaning to regional pilots and others trying to make a living.
Makes claims about his wife being a VP and how sucessfull he is and how much money he makes:laugh:, while he spits in other peoples faces here (Jetblue, SWA etc.....) then claims he is debating for fun.
It goes on and on and on on.
Absolutely pathetic.
In fact I know who he is.