Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The CRJ might burn a little less fuel but the 175/190 is much lower in MX. Less checks. Still cheaper.If I understand correctly, the -705 is just a CRJ900 that is only certified for 75 seats. Bombardier apparently went out of their way to certify this version of the -900 for 75 as a work around on the scope conflict so they could secure the Air Canada order.
The EMB170/175/190...as far as pax comfort is concerned, there is no equal amongst the regional manufacurers. No doubt it is a great aircraft...however, the the extra gross weight of the aircraft (obviously requiring a little more fuel to operate) has been a primary reason for not moving away from the CRJ's altogether.
More likely result will be CAL taking back the 51 jets if Coex does not want them. Then we will lease them to to Skywest which in turn will staff them at a much lower cost than Expressjet ever could. The reason why? When Skywest figures the cost they figure it at new crew rates ie. 1st year F/O's and year 2 or 3 Capt's. They did the same thing to us at Air Wisconsin. We ended up losing all of our flying to them. When you are trying to compete against a person bidding aganist you at an "incremental" cost, you can never be cheaper.
Well, basically what I said but with a lot more technical crap behind it.![]()
Thats very easy, express jet raised the bar on pay for all regional pilots.
Mesa has always done the opposite.
MESA SUCKS!
The branded flying was the idea of management not pilots, express jet pilots have a right to have pride in who the work for.
Medeco
How do they figure crew rates at 1st year F/O and 2ND/3RD year captain when fairly senior crews from LC and DEN do a fair amount of the UAX flying? Air Wisconsin lost their United flying because they had the highest costs of any UAX carrier and Geoff Crowley tried to see who would blink first.
More likely result will be CAL taking back the 51 jets if Coex does not want them. Then we will lease them to to Skywest which in turn will staff them at a much lower cost than Expressjet ever could. The reason why? When Skywest figures the cost they figure it at new crew rates ie. 1st year F/O's and year 2 or 3 Capt's. They did the same thing to us at Air Wisconsin. We ended up losing all of our flying to them. When you are trying to compete against a person bidding aganist you at an "incremental" cost, you can never be cheaper.
Let the industry stagnate for a while, and when SKyWests contracts come up for renegotiation, it could just as easily happen to them.
Please. It's funny how Skywest is the bad guys for "blowing their loads at the prospect of a contract with Continental" but every time Express Jet get's more Delta flying out of SLC your pilots are all "blowing their loads" over the prospect of more flying with Delta at Skywest expense. What a bunch of hypocrites. Pathetic.
And some Skywest pilots are showing exactly how they feel about it by cutting off XJET planes on the taxiways and blocking the frequency.....I wish I could write it off to "coincidence" but it's happening way too often lately.....way to show your maturity!......Oh and too the SKW guys that cut off an XJT in LAX a few weeks ago.....then got chastized by ramp, then giving a F.U. type response on the radio as you rolled by.......I guess the joke was on you when you turned down the wrong alley and had to beg ramp to let you turn around without a tug......
I don't mean to bash SKW pilots, but come on guys! stop trying to make conversation with me, then work in a little gloating about the SKW/XJT thing!
FF, if you would read his post instead of jumping on your soapbox, you would see that he was referring to the contracts OO has with the airlines for the flying they do. Not for the labor/management relationship.
And some Skywest pilots are showing exactly how they feel about it