nwaredtail
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2005
- Posts
- 622
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So far in 2008, 100 NWA pilots have retired and 37 have opted to stay past 60, with only 50% of those in Captain positions.
I thought Moak said no NWA pilots would retire?
Do you think that there would have been 100 NWA retirements if they were assured of substantial pay raises, significant equity $$$, and a 14% DC contribution based on aforementioned significant pay hikes?
I am sure that some would still have retired, but I am also quite convinced that some would not have.
The problem is that we need a crystal ball, and don't have one. We just have a problem with NWA guys claiming a seniority stake based on retirements that may not happen.
[/QUOTE]On the other hand, you are certainly right not to expect to take a seniority hit based on a lack of retirements that may not happen.
Also easily rectified, just tell us.Easily rectified, and you all would be surprised what was agreed to about that. Wait and see.
Also easily rectified, just tell us.
The fact that DAL pilots are not aware of Moak's last offer to NWA is SCARYYYYYY.
I'm not sure that he said that. But let me ask you this.
Do you think that there would have been 100 NWA retirements if they were assured of substantial pay raises, significant equity $$$, and a 14% DC contribution based on aforementioned significant pay hikes? Most could care less considering they have very nice pensions and a large amount of them have military retirements on top of that.
I am sure that some would still have retired, but I am also quite convinced that some would not have. Sure some Might stay for the potential equity and would leave shortly there after.
The problem is that we need a crystal ball, and don't have one. No you dont, even if all of them stayed to 65 they WILL retire and the seniority progression WILL be there. We just have a problem with NWA guys claiming a seniority stake based on retirements that may not happen. Yeah you're right they will never retire![]()
On the other hand, you are certainly right not to expect to take a seniority hit based on a lack of retirements that may not happen.
FYI . Most of the guys staying past 60 are hoping for an equity payment from the merger other wise they would be gone.
Bottom line is NWA pilots have alot more seniority progression expected in the very near future more so than DAL even if everyone stayed to 65 (not going to happen). Thats why dynamic seniority is fair for everyone. That way we all keep the same progression in relative time that we expected as stand alone carriers. Time is money
Yet AGAIN, when we retired our 2000 or so senior Captains, we also parked our MD11s, 767-200s, 737-200s, and 737-300s. Our seniority progression after the retirements was minimal.
How would your guys do if you right now parked all of the DC9s and 742s? You are NOT taking into account the loss of airplanes that likely will go away on your side. We shouldn't have to take a hit for your old planes.
Age 60 has nothing to do with it. When they do retire we want the benefit just like you did when your 2000 or so left before BK.Can you get it in writing that ALL of your age 60 guys WILL leave and the document will stand up in a court of law? Otherwise, fogetaboutit.
Bye Bye--General Lee
The Delta pilots on the property have already reaped the windfall from the retirements.
There was no mass exodus at NWA.
Anyone with any credibility want to dispute that?
Now, DALPA wants to try to sell an inferior SLI to the NWA people by telling them how much better their contract will be.
AA told the TWA people how much better their contract was, too. Scant comfort during the 3 1/2 years I was on the street.
Don't fall for it. TC