Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

NWA Phantom retirements

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
We "reaped" nothing. The earlies were bought and paid for, through the loss of our DB plan. NWA still has theirs, albeit frozen.

So, we kept our frozen DB, therefore we should get it shoved to us on the SLI? O.K., got it.


We were not the ones who had to replace a member of our negotiating committee, nor did we have to have multiple witnesses in the room to make sure that our guys were doing their jobs.

Puff, you are a LIAR!. Our merger committee is the same as day 1. Again, PUFFDRIVR is a LIAR. The multiple witness's were the advisory committee put together to make sure all seniority levels had a say. It's a little more democratic than having Moak in a room by himself making deals he has yet to tell the DAL pilots about.

We DID agree to a NWA proposed SLI, only to have them pull the offer because they had not thought the matter through themselves.

Again, Puff is a liar. Give me the proposal number, date and with merger committee members were there for the accepted proposal.


In short, the "hicks" from the south have their act together, and the red tails have their tails between their legs out on the road doing spin control.

Yup, agreeing to reduced contract improvements was really smart. Thank Moak for that.


You want credit for a few guys who MIGHT retire? Pullease.

You better give Moak a call about this.
 
You are NOT taking into account the loss of airplanes that likely will go away on your side. We shouldn't have to take a hit for your old planes.
Once again (how many times has it been now?) YOU are NOT taking into account that it is the DALPA SCOPE CLAUSE, or lack thereof, that ALLOWS those airplanes to go away! What don't you get about that? NWALPA scope prevents those aircraft from being parked without parking RJ's enmass. How many RJ's wil DAL have to park if the new DAL parks the airplanes you are talking about? ZERO. Our guys need to pay the price for your PATHETIC scope?! YGBSM.

Or, as you like to say: fogetaboutit!!!( I doubt you are either Italian OR from Jersey)
 
So, we kept our frozen DB, therefore we should get it shoved to us on the SLI? O.K., got it.

Typical blue collar response. You are not getting anything SHOVED on you. What you want is some sort of OK to account for retirements that MIGHT happen with the list. Never mind that we got rid of 4 aircraft types at the same time to offset that. Never mind that the majority of those guys would have been gone prior to December anyway, another bunch were on LTD. Don't let the facts get in the way of your rhetoric. In reality, we benefitted from about 500 guys going early while losing some 60 a/c AND our DB. AND, all of this happened prior to ANY deal even being conceived/announced/sealed. Bottom line, you don't get credit for OUR early retirements and should not get credit for retirements that MIGHT happen. You know it too, so stop belaboring the point.



Puff, you are a LIAR!. Our merger committee is the same as day 1. Again, PUFFDRIVR is a LIAR. The multiple witness's were the advisory committee put together to make sure all seniority levels had a say. It's a little more democratic than having Moak in a room by himself making deals he has yet to tell the DAL pilots about.


Nup, I don't lie. We don't need people watching our people. Perhaps it was not the merger committee, perhaps it was the negotiating committee. It doesn't really matter. A member was replaced. Why was that again? While we're on the "lying" thing, wasn't there something about notification and vacations which was vehemently denied, which has now been begrudgingly been accepted. Now the excuse is that it came too late. What of this 1.5 billion payment coming--you guys like to point our ours--which might put a bit of a cash crunch on your operation? Questions, questions.


Again, Puff is a liar. Give me the proposal number, date and with merger committee members were there for the accepted proposal.

Blather, blather, blather. I know you guys are running around on damage control with spin against the "man"-Delta- trying to keep you down. The reality is what I typed. I don't lie. It serves no purpose to lie. Go ask them if they made a proposal that Delta accepted--remember those rumors that were out that there was an agreement--and that they later pulled. Perhaps the name caller needs to be called the name. The liar, liar, pants on fire argument is not going to get you out of this one. The Delta MEC is in the right, yet they are moving on-taking the high ground. The NWA MEC is out on the excuse war path. Pointing fingers with carefully worded language spun to put the Delta MEC in a bad light. Meanwhile the merger moves forward, and will continue to do so. I surmise that Steenland will eventually get tired of these reindeer games messing with his "out" money and start taking action in the fall--you know--after the busy summer season. The dreaded "F" bomb will get thrown around, and backwards movement will begin at NWA. DC-9s will be parked along with merging/dissolution of Compass, perhaps some 727 classics-or even all of them. That sets the stage for the merger consummation and the setting of a PID. Not looking good on those "career expectations", especially when you throw in the newly arriving 6 777 LRs, and the soon-to-be, meaning before the PID, announced 777 order.


Yup, agreeing to reduced contract improvements was really smart. Thank Moak for that.


It actually was. The company needed our help for their merger. We weren't getting cooperation from the "our way or the highway" crowd. So we traded favors for a little insurance on our side, and some contract improvements to springboard off of for both sides. A brilliant move. The sooner you realize that it was Steenland who screwed you over, and not the Delta pilots, the better off you will be.



You better give Moak a call about this.


I'll make you a deal, you can have credit for your possible retirements, we get credit for the 25 777 aircraft deal which has not been announced yet. They both are the same thing, promises of future repayments. IOW, blather.
 
Once again (how many times has it been now?) YOU are NOT taking into account that it is the DALPA SCOPE CLAUSE, or lack thereof, that ALLOWS those airplanes to go away! What don't you get about that? NWALPA scope prevents those aircraft from being parked without parking RJ's enmass. How many RJ's wil DAL have to park if the new DAL parks the airplanes you are talking about? ZERO. Our guys need to pay the price for your PATHETIC scope?! YGBSM.

Or, as you like to say: fogetaboutit!!!( I doubt you are either Italian OR from Jersey)


Some of us don't think that Compass is a player going forward anyway. Not to mention that we had to give a wavier in the scope specifically for the weight of those Compass airplanes. As for our scope being pathetic, I agree. Happened before my time, and it is a bone of contention right down the middle of our list. What's your point. I think that they will gladly let Compass go, if it means putting pressure on the NWA pilots to be a little more reasonable. I certainly do not wish for that, and I fully expect you to quote it out of context in your next diatribe. Nonetheless, it is there, and it is a YP not an MP.
 
As for our scope being pathetic, I agree. Happened before my time, and it is a bone of contention right down the middle of our list.

Just like I thought, lower seniority FO pissed he will be moving quite a bit backward. Mergers suck, sorry.
 
Just like I thought, lower seniority FO pissed he will be moving quite a bit backward. Mergers suck, sorry.

Actually, I am a 737-800 captain, hired in the late 90's. I am about 20 numbers away from 767ER captain. I know that Moscow, Nice, Frankfurt, etc are not PREMIUM widebody flying, but I think that an arbitrator might beg to differ. Sorry to disappoint you, perhaps your can find some relevant arguments next. Yep, mergers do indeed suck. Right back at ya slick, next!!
 
Actually, I am a 737-800 captain, hired in the late 90's. I am about 20 numbers away from 767ER captain. I know that Moscow, Nice, Frankfurt, etc are not PREMIUM widebody flying, but I think that an arbitrator might beg to differ. Sorry to disappoint you, perhaps your can find some relevant arguments next. Yep, mergers do indeed suck. Right back at ya slick, next!!

well, if that is true, I would be senior to you, even by DALPA's last proposal. I feel better already! http://forums.flightinfo.com/images/icons/icon28.gif
 
Actually, I am a 737-800 captain, hired in the late 90's. I am about 20 numbers away from 767ER captain. I know that Moscow, Nice, Frankfurt, etc are not PREMIUM widebody flying, but I think that an arbitrator might beg to differ. Sorry to disappoint you, perhaps your can find some relevant arguments next. Yep, mergers do indeed suck. Right back at ya slick, next!!


If you were hired in the late 90s, the pathetic scope happened during your time! Line in the sand at 70, remember?
 
If you were hired in the late 90s, the pathetic scope happened during your time! Line in the sand at 70, remember?

Nope, the damage was done in the contract prior to my arrival. Since then I have been a staunch advocate of turning it around, but I am only 1 vote. How many seats does Compass allow? What is the weight of that aircraft? Why did we have to amend our scope to ALLOW for that aircraft? Questions, questions. Red herrings, red herrings.

I am glad that you take so much fervor in being senior to somebody and putting them down about it. Those kinds of attitudes tend to come around and bite you in the posterior.

While you poke our scope, we poke your rates, and scoff at your idea of "premium" widebody flying. You are a joke, and are grasping at straws and resorting to attacks on a personal level, as you have no leg to stand on any other way. The arbitrator will see through that as well. As I said, next!!
 
well, if that is true, I would be senior to you, even by DALPA's last proposal. I feel better already!

That last proposal was much better than you'll see this time around. The object then was to start close to get a deal done quickly so both sides would benefit. Both sides now have to change tactics to prepare for the probability of arbitration. I think you'll see something along the lines of relative seniority by equipment this time around. Widebody/757/narrowbody like the result of the last arbitrated airline merger settlement. Your senior guys will be very happy.

I'm still hoping for a big contract improvement and a negotiated SLI we can all be equally unhappy with. I just don't see a negotiated SLI as much of a possibility anymore. It would have been different if both sides had come out saying "no arbitration, we're going to stay here until we hammer this out." Unfortuately when arbitration is presented as the solution by one side on day 1, the path is clear.
 
Last edited:
That last proposal was much better than you'll see this time around. The object then was to start close to get a deal done quickly so both sides would benefit. Both sides now have to change tactics to prepare for the probability of arbitration. I think you'll see something along the lines of relative seniority by equipment this time around. Widebody/757/narrowbody like the result of the last arbitrated airline merger settlement. Your senior guys will be very happy.

I'm still hoping for a big contract improvement and a negotiated SLI we can all be equally unhappy with. I just don't see a negotiated SLI as much of a possibility anymore.

Sooo.....the next proposal from DALPA will have, what, 1500 slots reserved above current NWA pilots for DAL pilots not hired yet? Cool. See ya in arbitration with that;)
 
Hey, Puff, we're NOT going away and maybe there's a REASON we sound like the PanAm guys. Forgive me if I don't get down on my knees and worship the great double-breasted gods from the South... :rolleyes:

I'm not going away because history tends to repeat itself. Beware of ANY pilot group telling you "you're going to get a great deal if you just take our offer".

NWA will get arbitration as specified by Bond/McCaskill and ALPA merger policy. Pretty scary, huh? TC
 
DC-9s will be parked along with merging/dissolution of Compass, perhaps some 727 classics-or even all of them. That sets the stage for the merger consummation and the setting of a PID. Not looking good on those "career expectations", especially when you throw in the newly arriving 6 777 LRs, and the soon-to-be, meaning before the PID, announced 777 order.
Hilarious. Ummmm....we retired the 727's a long time ago. I miss them but they used a lot of gas. I agree....you are not a liar.....you're just grossly ignorant. That fact mixed with your stereotypical Deltoid arrogance is an unfortunate combo.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom