Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Goodbye Horizon Jets...

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
So both of you had the seniority to hang on through the upcoming Horizon furloughs. I promise you that you do not have the seniority to hang on through the upcoming Alaska furloughs............How will you take your crow? With a little butter and garlic

Really? Tell me something I don't know. Are you still at Alaska? I would have thought a bright guy like yourself would have left by now.:rolleyes:

I prefer my crow with a large glass of beer.:beer:
 
Last edited:
Really? Tell me something I don't know. Are you still at Alaska? I would have thought a bright guy like yourself would have left by now.:rolleyes:

I prefer my crow with a large glass of beer.:beer:

Ahh the tool comes out of the box. Just trying to slap you for your $hitty comments to your former Horizon bretheren. The dip$hit$ that we work for just dropped a grenade in their crew room and instead of helping them put the pin back in you chucked it out the window.......
 
Getting rid of the jets is just a precursor to the acquisition of Alaska by SWA. Horizon will be sold as part of the transaction. SWAPA will possibly allow the Q400 feed to continue (or not).
bull********************....
 
Ahh the tool comes out of the box. Just trying to slap you for your $hitty comments to your former Horizon bretheren. The dip$hit$ that we work for just dropped a grenade in their crew room and instead of helping them put the pin back in you chucked it out the window.......

What comments? That I'm glad I'm not there. Seems reasonable to me. I'm sure a lot of them wish they weren't there either. It wasn't directed to them, just a statement.

For all my former Horizon bretheren, especially those on this board that know me, I'm sorry if my comments offended you as much as they did tico. I didn't mean it. All those beers we drank those many years were not just a set up so I could make fun of you when our collective management took a giant dump on you.

In all seriousness, I really do feel for the Horizon guys and hope those 20 options on the Qs are taken so that no one has to fear for their job.
 
None-the-less Horizon still has a good product and a strong passenger base. Granted they will be in the market for more mechanics once they become an all Q400 fleet. Reliability continues to be a factor. :(
 
I wouldn't assume that all of the pertinent information was disclosed in that forum. It's not like they're gonna say something like "We believe that the threat of bringing in a third party to perform flying that overlaps that done by both of our wholly owned airlines will give us considerable leverage to lower pilot costs at both units which should show up as a saving of blah blah blah......"

I think that the most likely scenario is that the AAG is being configured for some sort of consolidation-that would be a scenario where a bunch of RJ pilots not working for peanuts might be an obstacle to getting a deal done.

If I accept your drift, then QX pilots are in more trouble than we think. For example, our Q400 CA rates, let alone our 70-seat RJ rates, are already higher than jetBlue and USAirways Embraer 190 rates.

Nothing would surprise me much right now, but I think it's almost as likely that AS pilots would invite the 190 on their property for less than QX's current RJ and Q400 rates. Why not? If it's growth and it's going to be the junior aircraft, why wouldn't AS pilots take it at jetBlue or Airways rates?

What's lost in all this is why AAG doesn't just merge their two airlines. The overhead squandered on running two airlines under one marketing scheme is shameful. I'm surprised the board lets management get away with it.
 
What's lost in all this is why AAG doesn't just merge their two airlines. The overhead squandered on running two airlines under one marketing scheme is shameful. I'm surprised the board lets management get away with it.

Because whether people recognize it or not there is a 'for sale' sign hanging over every airline, including AS. The acquiring airline will merge operations/staff with AS, not QX. Perhaps there is a Skywest uniform in the future for QX pilots........
 
If I accept your drift, then QX pilots are in more trouble than we think. For example, our Q400 CA rates, let alone our 70-seat RJ rates, are already higher than jetBlue and USAirways Embraer 190 rates.

Nothing would surprise me much right now, but I think it's almost as likely that AS pilots would invite the 190 on their property for less than QX's current RJ and Q400 rates. Why not? If it's growth and it's going to be the junior aircraft, why wouldn't AS pilots take it at jetBlue or Airways rates?

What's lost in all this is why AAG doesn't just merge their two airlines. The overhead squandered on running two airlines under one marketing scheme is shameful. I'm surprised the board lets management get away with it.

Yep, the shock waves from Jet Blue rolling over on the 190 rates are still spreading through the industry. USAir then found itself having to underbid the Mesas of the world to capture 190 flying that, according to the ALPA mainline chest-thumpers, it already owned. Now a bunch of turboprop pilots on the other side of the country are going to end up being told: "they bent over, so you will too."

It's the whipsaw value that keeps the two airlines separate. If there's one thing airline managers fear it's united pilot groups. I've always thought that Alaska and Horizon had the best chance of anyone in the industry to get past the tribal jealousy thing and "get it right" and work together for the common good, whether through making joining the pilot groups a negotiating goal or simply understanding the benefits of not being the first one to grab for a crumb that management lets fall to the floor. I know for a fact that the Alaska pilots proposed a bid-through arrangement for Horizon pilots that would have saved millions annually that went nowhere fast.

It's hard to imagine the AAG making a capital investment in an EMB 190 program. I think that the jury's still out on the airframe itself, and even if that weren't an issue I don't think that Ayer & Co. would recognize opportunity if it walked up and bit them on the ass. There are a lot of advantages to having a single fleet type on the books. If they really thought that they needed that sort of lift in the system I'm pretty sure that they'd just pay someone else to take on the risks of ownership.

If the Air Group did decide to get into the 100 seat segment, it's unclear to me how much the Alaska pilots would have to underbid the current Horizon rates by to make it a wash financially. Pilots' hourly rates are just a part of compensation costs. Alaska's FA's get paid more, Alaska stays in nicer hotels, etc. I don't think that it could happen at rates above the highest FO scale.

Whatever, my money's on Alaska and SW deciding that beating each other up really isn't that much fun after all. The guys at the top will get paid, they'll throw the poor schmucks still holding onto their ALK shares a bone, and that will be that. Horizon will get spun off or sold to an existing operator who wants to get into the Q400 biz, and that will be that as well. Game over.
 
What comments? That I'm glad I'm not there. Seems reasonable to me. I'm sure a lot of them wish they weren't there either. It wasn't directed to them, just a statement.quote]


Don't waste your breath on him.

The
Idiot
Continues
On

The folks that bash the exco could not hold the chairman's water. The adults are in charge.
 
If I accept your drift, then QX pilots are in more trouble than we think. For example, our Q400 CA rates, let alone our 70-seat RJ rates, are already higher than jetBlue and USAirways Embraer 190 rates.

Nothing would surprise me much right now, but I think it's almost as likely that AS pilots would invite the 190 on their property for less than QX's current RJ and Q400 rates. Why not? If it's growth and it's going to be the junior aircraft, why wouldn't AS pilots take it at jetBlue or Airways rates?

What's lost in all this is why AAG doesn't just merge their two airlines. The overhead squandered on running two airlines under one marketing scheme is shameful. I'm surprised the board lets management get away with it.

So someone else gets it too^. Its not just me that thinks Horizon pay rates contributed to the loss of airframes. You are naive to think its not a factor-although not the only factor. A new contract for Horizon pilots needs to put them in a competitive state, not a "we are the only pilots in this industry that have the nuts to set the bar high."
 
So someone else gets it too^. Its not just me that thinks Horizon pay rates contributed to the loss of airframes. You are naive to think its not a factor-although not the only factor. A new contract for Horizon pilots needs to put them in a competitive state, not a "we are the only pilots in this industry that have the nuts to set the bar high."

You seem to be pretty interested in lower pay for Horizon pilots.
 
Hey Malsr why don't you go tell the Southwest pilots how they will be losing a/c if they dont drop their pay in line with the bottem feeders like United, Delta, Northwest, ect ect.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom