And I would prefer your math. It is still not a fair integration either way...
I like your math better!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I like your math better!
I don't know where the ratio lines are drawn, but wouldn't it make sense to try to make those lines match current equipment bids? If so, that would probably be close to correct, but still favor the NWA side slightly.
Like I have said. It depends on how they take the 1/3,1/3,1/3.
One way is almost DOH at the bottom 1/3. and the other way favors us DAL boys.
Could only think while they were talking that nothing could be worse then a 5day trip out of DTW.
Relative seniority was not good enough...Correct to you is your new hire, still in indoc, be senior to me with a 10yr seniority.... Come on!!!!
Relative seniority was not good enough...
Ratio with dynamic seniority proposed by your negotiators was not good enough...
I do not think we can continue playing this game for long before Joe Merchant's "ATR drivers get DOH at Delta" starts to look reasonable. After all, if equipment, base and bid has nothing to do with it, Joe is right.
I respectfully disagree & you have no idea where I am.
I do not think we can continue playing this game for long before Joe Merchant's "ATR drivers get DOH at Delta" starts to look reasonable. After all, if equipment, base and bid has nothing to do with it, Joe is right.
i agree...
the logic makes sense to me... if you go lease/buy a brand new Hybrid and get 60mpg, your monthly nut is still significantly higher than my paid off jeep cherokee at 12 mpg. especially on shorter routes.