Bringupthebird
Grumpy? Who-Me?
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2006
- Posts
- 2,182
Thanks for getting wrapped around the axle so quickly.
But who can explain why pilots would be better off, instead of fixing ALPA's problems, to trash the entire unity between and among airline pilots?
Why would we be better off to be marginalized in the field of aviation safety and turn everything over to the NTSB and FAA?
Why would we be better off to have each individual pilot group struggle to pay for services such as aeromedical that are far more efficiently delivered with costs spread over many thousands instead of a few hundred or maybe a few thousand at best?
Why would isolation pay off ?
Why would management prefer to deal with a few pilots who have no connection with outside labor groups?
C'mon people, these aren't hard questions. How have in-house labor groups fared when faced with adamantly anti-labor management, management that would just as soon scuttle the airline as give in to reasonable labor demands? Ask APA. How'd that strike work out for ya?
Why isn't Mesa or Trans States or NWA demanding to have it's own Pilots Advisory Board instead of ALPA?
The so-called leaders of movements such as USAPA privately acknowledge that they will never have the power to do any more than make suggestions to management and for that gutless mission they'll need 1.8% of your paycheck (plus assessments, oh the assessments), a real savings!
ALPA has real and serious problems - no one has denied that. But the prospect that we dump 75+ years of efforts by thousands of pilots, just because we are too lazy to fix what we've enjoyed is unconscionable.
But who can explain why pilots would be better off, instead of fixing ALPA's problems, to trash the entire unity between and among airline pilots?
Why would we be better off to be marginalized in the field of aviation safety and turn everything over to the NTSB and FAA?
Why would we be better off to have each individual pilot group struggle to pay for services such as aeromedical that are far more efficiently delivered with costs spread over many thousands instead of a few hundred or maybe a few thousand at best?
Why would isolation pay off ?
Why would management prefer to deal with a few pilots who have no connection with outside labor groups?
C'mon people, these aren't hard questions. How have in-house labor groups fared when faced with adamantly anti-labor management, management that would just as soon scuttle the airline as give in to reasonable labor demands? Ask APA. How'd that strike work out for ya?
Why isn't Mesa or Trans States or NWA demanding to have it's own Pilots Advisory Board instead of ALPA?
The so-called leaders of movements such as USAPA privately acknowledge that they will never have the power to do any more than make suggestions to management and for that gutless mission they'll need 1.8% of your paycheck (plus assessments, oh the assessments), a real savings!
ALPA has real and serious problems - no one has denied that. But the prospect that we dump 75+ years of efforts by thousands of pilots, just because we are too lazy to fix what we've enjoyed is unconscionable.
Last edited: