Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No announcement from the NMB yet. As far as newhires, I would think all pilots on the seniority list would be eligible to vote.
I know you want a USAPA supporter to answer and I'm not impersonating one but I just wanted to point out that as a former Teamster, a current (inactive) APA member, and an ALPA member at three different carriers I feel comfortable saying there's nothing intrinsically better or worse about the organization of any pilots' unions. The APA is just as screwed-up and has just as many internal detractors as does ALPA. Unity and happiness in one's union comes more from effective leadership than any other component. Effective pilot union leaders are few and far in between.Q: How does the APA compare? Is the APA a good model? Does USAPA want to be like APA or better and/or different?
I heard some 14 day countdown began 1/23/8. Does anyone know if this is close to a vote conclusion?
Is is true that new hires may not vote?
....
I’d like some East guys to post on why you submitted cards and why you intend to vote for USAPA if an election is held
Why I submitted the card.
1. ALPA agreed to do away with the pension with no pilot vote.
2. ALPA allowed the increase from 85 hours to 95 hours a month. that kept the furloughees out another 2 years at least.
3. ALPA allowed the outsourcing of the 170's and 175's, keeping the furloughees out and downgrading more Captains.
4. ALPA allowed the wholesale outsourcing frenzy of RJ's (hundreds of airframes) with over 1800 pilots on the street.
So ALPA '"allowed" all that stuff eh? I am an ardent ALPA hater. but that is just plain stupid.
No they didn't. The bankruptcy court would have approved far more onerous concessions, and then would have issued an injunction to prevent a work stoppage. ALPA did everything possible, and probably prevented far worse concessions that would have happened in an 1113(c) filing. It's easy to make ALPA your scapegoat, but you should place your blame where it belongs: an anti-labor government and anti-labor courts.Yes the union had to agree to all of it for the company to be allowed to do it.
So ALPA '"allowed" all that stuff eh? I am an ardent ALPA hater. but that is just plain stupid.
I am wondering how a new union will affect any change in the Nicalau award...That arbitration is complete and will stand with alpa, usapa or no union at all......
And you think the West pilots are going to just sit by and allow you and uSAPa to rape them? I think not. They'll refuse to pay dues, and with 40% of the pilot group not paying dues, the new "union" will be completely impotent (although these idiots would probably be impotent even if 100% paid their dues). Then a small group of West pilots that actually join and pay dues will be able to sue uSAPa for DFR, since a virtual abrogation of the Nic award is an obvious DFR breach. uSAPa would be bankrupt just trying to defend against the lawsuit, never even getting to the point of having to pay out a settlement. You guys are mind-numbingly stupid if you think this uSAPa nonsense will lead you to anywhere but immense failure.Well, I'm not sure how they are thinking, but here is a possible way...
The problem with the ALPA structure is that there are two groups (one from East and one from West) negotiating a joint contract. If the East negotiators wanted to make a change in the contract protecting the East bases or upgrades, and the West did not agree, that would never make it into a proposal.
However, if a new union wins the election, the entire pilot group would be under that one union and a lot of that East/West distinction as far as the union goes would go away. The new collective MEC would then create a new negotiating team.
I don't think management cares who upgrades as long as they can staff the airline. If the pay is the same, who cares which side they came from...
Section 22 of the contract says base and captain bids are based on seniority. They make a simple change to that language saying those will now be based on length of service with the company. The Nic. seniority list will stay intact, although it would be virtually meaningless as far as upgrading and bases are concerned...
Well, I'm not sure how they are thinking, but here is a possible way...
However, if a new union wins the election, the entire pilot group would be under that one union and a lot of that East/West distinction as far as the union goes would go away. The new collective MEC would then create a new negotiating team.
Section 22 of the contract says base and captain bids are based on seniority. They make a simple change to that language saying those will now be based on length of service with the company. The Nic. seniority list will stay intact, although it would be virtually meaningless as far as upgrading and bases are concerned...
amazing....
Yes, it is amazing. In fact, I am a little disappointed. I was hoping I was going to be called in as a divide and conquer consultant. Looks like the pilots are doing a swell job themselves.
Thanks alot!
Keep in mind, most of the rhettoric and pure stupidity posted by the likes of Kerosene, BeCareful and Weasil Lips are guys who were furloughed and are the most disenfranchised of the East bunch.
You can pretty much ignore ALGFLYER - he was neither an America West employee or US Airways employee and should be thankful he even gets to fight with us as he backdoored his way in and should be happy to be at the bottom of the list,.....
amazing....