Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Should pax know pilot experience ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jetflier
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 18

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Fix the problem by paying professional wages and providing QOL... that will attract quality applicants.

The majors aren't having any problem attacting quality applicants, so raising pay there does nothing.

Regionals are paying more now than they ever did, yet they are having more trouble finding people now than they did back when they were paying 14K to FOs and 26K to CAs.

The problem is that the wage cuts at the majors have dis-incentivized (?) working for the airlines. People don't see the payoff at the other end, so they are not entering the field.

Regionals cannot afford to pay more, nor do they have any over control major airline pay, so they have done the only thing they can do: lower the barriers to entry.
 
We should base the cost of tickets on every flight on the experience level of the pilots.

Start with a "base cost" that is equal to all flights and then have all passengers pay the "adjusted price" once they show at the airport that's determined by the experience (and worth) of the crew. A certain percentage of the adjusted price will go to the pilots.

For instance, A 2500 hour Mesa Captain and 250 hour F/O, would share a small fraction (if any) of the increased portion of the price and a 20 year Eagle greybeard captain with 15,000 hours and his 7th year F/O with 6,500 hours would get most of it.

Same goes for a low time Skybus crew and a high time NWA crew.

That way, you get what you pay for.

Who's with me on this !
 
PAX won't care about experience level until there is a serious trend in accidents attributed to this. Most believe that if they've past the mandated checkrides that all is at least minimally good. They play the statistics. Most aren't regular travelers and the 3 or so (if that) trips they take a year tend to be safe and without incident, they are not going to care much or avoid flying becasue of perceived lack of experience. Most have no idea or basis to judge what is or isn't experience. I've known guys who have had thousands of light GA hours before getting to a regional. Does this make them more exerienced when the captain has half that but most of it being in their type?
 
I can see the PAs now...


Ladies and Gentlemen... Welcome aboard FlybyNite Airlines flight 123 nonstop service to Cleveland...Flight time today will be 1 hour and 20 minutes.

Your Captain has been with the company 23 years and has over 12000 hours of flight experiance. With 10000 in Jet Aircraft. His turn ons include long walks on the beach and beer! His turn offs include Cleveland Layovers and flight attendants that keep calling the cockpit whining about the temp in the first 3 rows of coach.

Your FO is a graduate of Embry Riddle Aeronautical University and has been with the company for about a week and a half. He thinks he is better than the Captain becuase he has 1000 hours and 25 of them in a Jet. As you can see he is sporting up his pilot uniform with the addition of the new Ipod touch and a stylish frosted hair-do!


That would hilarious if it weren't so true....
 
A Doctor advances based on his continual training and performance. An airline pilot advances based solely upon seniority. The analogy of comparing the two only works if you are advocating that all pilot pay and advancement should be on merit/performance and not based upon seniority.

Who is talking about advancing ? I was talking about experience. If it 1/16 mile vis blowing snow at LGA, I'd want the guy with more experience!
 
Do the pax get a discount if we're on IOE and it's our first landing in type? Stick a "Student Drive" sticker on the side of the plane.
 
Who is talking about advancing ? I was talking about experience. If it 1/16 mile vis blowing snow at LGA, I'd want the guy with more experience!

And this is another reason Age 60 rule change is a good thing. I can't believe we have been throwing all that experience out for years. Experience counts.
 
Who is talking about advancing ? I was talking about experience. If it 1/16 mile vis blowing snow at LGA, I'd want the guy with more experience!


1/16 mile? :eek:

So what's the "high" time guy gonna do vs. a "low" time guy in that situation?
 
Who is talking about advancing ? I was talking about experience. If it 1/16 mile vis blowing snow at LGA, I'd want the guy with more experience!


Heyas Jet,

This is fixable. Just get rid of the scam known as "code sharing".

Let people decide if they want to fly on NWA, DAL or some other name they "trust" or if they're comfortable flying someone they've never heard of.

If you buy a ticket on UAL, you should be on UAL metal.

Nu
 
A Doctor advances based on his continual training and performance. An airline pilot advances based solely upon seniority. The analogy of comparing the two only works if you are advocating that all pilot pay and advancement should be on merit/performance and not based upon seniority.
Disagree. An airline pilot gets the OPPORTUNITY to advance based solely upon seniority. Once that opportunity is presented he/she then actually advances based upon training and performance in the schoolhouse/simulator/aircraft in front of the FAA or their designee.
 
people care about marcus welby M.D., and could care less about ralph cramden a.k.a. airline pilot. no public sympathy is forthcoming and as far as the smoking holes go we can always eliminate the baaaad carriers through attrition as we have always done.
 
An airline pilot gets the OPPORTUNITY to advance based solely upon seniority.

Exactly. If Bob Hoover comes to your airline tomorrow he is sitting on reserve. The fact he is a better pilot then probably 90% of the people flying for the airline isn't relevant. You can't have it both ways where one claims they are where they are because of their skills and at the same time restrict more qualified people from taking those positions due to lack of seniority.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom