Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why should a 20 year military pilot have to start at the bottom of the list, behind some 28 year old kid 1 year into their major? Insane, indeed.
Spare me. Military pilots get shoved to the top of the resume heap at the major and national airlines. At FedEx if you're not an ex/current military pilot you better walk on water to get hired. The airlines don't owe you a living. Get over it.
Spare me. Military pilots get shoved to the top of the resume heap at the major and national airlines. At FedEx if you're not an ex/current military pilot you better walk on water to get hired. The airlines don't owe you a living. Get over it.
Are we still arguing about ridiculous ideas like national seniority lists? I don't care whether you think it's the best idea since the pill, it's just never going to happen. Start worrying about real solutions rather than jerking off to thoughts of unreasonable ideas.
Agenda? I have no agenda. I haven't been part of the ALPA leadership in a while now. I hold no ALPA positions whatsoever. I'm not even at an ALPA carrier. So, no, no agenda from me.Why is it so god damned unreasonable? Every damn idea i get gets shot down by guys at alpa that have obvious agendas--
You might as well ask "do you have something against world peace?" Of course I have no problem with the concept that you're proposing, but it's simply not realistic. The amount of negotiating leverage that would be required to achieve such a thing would require us to gut every contract in the industry. Not to mention that many airlines aren't even unionized, let alone ALPA. Then there's the problem of having tons of pilots that are opposed to the idea anyway because they don't want to risk getting bumped down the list at their company if someone else's company goes tango uniform. The problems are enormous, and there's simply too many to list. You would be more wisely spending your time by focusing on reasonable and realistic solutions.IS THERE ANYTHING ABOUT THAT LAST STATEMENT THAT YOU DISAGREE WITH?
pipe- many professionals take many risks- but how many of them start over at $30k and have their experience count for nothing when they do?
A new hire teacher in wisconsin-out of college! starts at $40k! That risk and culture and quick upgrade to go to F9 would still be there w/ a national list.
Sir wavelfyer,
A new hire is paid by the STATE. Right now, everything is private. If the industry were to say, become controlled by the federal gov then yes... a national line would make sense. Not now.
But.......if liquid oil was to become a endangered resource, relying on government action to control its use then yes a line might happen.
Could regulation happen??? Sure No doubt it.
Hub and spoke doesn't work. AA, dehubbed 3 years ago. UAL, same thing. DAL, stopped banking for a while in CVG. SWA, farthest thing from a hub. Citrus, followed swa and grew and profited. Hub and spoke is a horrible business model. Add in the fact that is snows, a lot, in our hub, and the airport authority makes snow removal look like a new event in the special olympics and circling the wagons in DIA is suicidal.
You forgot to mention the pilots subsidizing this growth with below industry standard wages and no pay raises for, what?, like 5 years?Actually, hub and spoke at Airtran is very profitable from everything our CEO has ever said. We would add more cities and grow our hub in Atlanta if we could get more gates. Every spoke we add from Atlanta is profitable almost from day one because we have over 50 cities feeding into Atlanta which allows for many route combinations to offer.
That being said, the company has diversified by adding alot of point to point flying. Most of the point to point flying is Midwest/Northeast to Florida bypassing the busy Atlanta hub. However, we proved most of these point routes would work before we started them because we were hauling the people through Atlanta anyway before the non-stop service started.
Airtran's growth has been slow (avg 10 airplanes per year), consistent (last 10 years), and profitable (last 8 years). The growth has depended on a profitable core (the Atlanta hub) which allows us to build new routes (which take time and money to develope).
I do agree with you though that Frontiers management has not utilized their core strengths in a post 9/11 environment as well as some other low cost carriers.
but back to the thread......what do F9 guys/gals think about a swa and F9 merger? Just curious.
Why should a 20 year military pilot have to start at the bottom of the list, behind some 28 year old kid 1 year into their major? Insane, indeed.