Nevets
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Posts
- 2,431
EBE,
You are forgetting a basic truth with that silly comment. They are happier here. That is the truth. Who cares if they were there for a few months and came here, if not having a union is what got this company to be what it is then good for them. Overall things are good here. They know that. I was at an ALPA carrier for two years before coming here, I am happier here. You and your friend can rail me and call me a tool, well I am a happier tool here. So I can't really see a logical point in putting those guys down. Who cares if they don't know how a union works or if they never attended a meeting.....They know the difference between an union carrier and a non-union carrier.
The problem is that people are corrolating unions at Mesa with unhappiness. The correct corrolation is the management at Mesa and unhapinnes. Just imagine how much more unhappy people would be if ALPA was NOT at Mesa. Or better yet, imagine your happines at Skywest if you had Mesa's management team? That is evidence that its management who has a DIRECT corrolation with happines.
There are many that are unhappy at Skywest. There are also many that are happy with Skywest. Why is this? Obvisoulsy the ones who are unhappy, its not because of ALPA. The only common thing between the two is management.
Also, there is a good argument to be made against people who complain about ALPA when they don't vote for reps, attend meetings, run for a rep position, volunteer on a committee, call email your rep, MEC officers, EVP, national officers, etc. Its like the people who complain about Bush but didn't even vote at the last election.