Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ASA MEC endorses TA/Bonus formula published...

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
As for the new 28.5, I also discussed this with the reps. To them it was perceived as concessionary. However there was simple logic behind it. Many of the pilots actually like to fly heavy block. Commuters especially like to trade trips around so as to create longer stretches of days off. The problem for many of those pilots came in many of their mutual trades, open time pick ups and swaps were constantly denied due to being over the 27.5 buffer by the slimmest of margins.

As with any provision in the contract, there are ways to use it to your advantage or have it used against you. I personally like the idea of the higher buffer BUT, like any other sane rational pilot, I don't want it used against me to make me work 6 days in a row.

I guess I'll have to weigh this clause carefully, but I'm leaning toward not being able to justify throwing out the whole cow over one bad hamburger. For those who didn't get that, I don't think it's worth voting no over this alone.
 
Last edited:
I think everybody has missed the biggest line in the scheduling section regarding the Scheduling Committe.... on page 67 line 19 "While the ASC members may make recommendations, the Company is under NO obligation to follow or even CONSIDER recommendations"

Hmmmm.... sounds like we have NO say in any of this. How is this a change for the better?????

"Denied....low coverage"
 
Scheduling....

Pete did a good job with the rigs. They should really, really help us out.

That being said, I am generally in favor of anything that keeps picking Pete out of the plane. We are all safer for that.

-Maybe he can find some more scheduling stuff to do which involves being him away from an airplane.
 
Pete respresents himself only. I guess you haven't figure that one out yet have you. Call the crew planners and ask them how he works.

We had an ATR pilot volunteer to help on his committee. Pete's response, we don't need any help, the ATR is going away.

TEX,
I have read all your posts on this matter. It is starting to sound more personal on your part than substantial. Evaluate your motives!
 
TEX,
I have read all your posts on this matter. It is starting to sound more personal on your part than substantial. Evaluate your motives!

Nay, already got what I want.

"And the Sch Chair could not approve this on his own as the MEC would be the decider."
 
I'm concerned about them calculating our pay correctly with the new rigs. They have a hard enough time now.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom