Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Just to let you know, the DC-9 is, was a Regional Jet

  • Thread starter Thread starter flyn96
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 14

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Theres no such thing as a "regional" jet beyond just marketing. I fly a CRJ-200 on routes over 1000 miles long. I fly them from a major hub to major cities. I'm in and out of Class B all day long every day. Theres nothing "regional" about what we do besides that its in the "region" of North America.

They're "outsourced" jets... plain and simple. Maybe I should start calling my CRJ the COJ.

The DC-9 may be a "regional" jet, but who cares about labels. Does it have a "regional" pay scale?
 
This should be viewed by every DC-9 pilot at Northwest. Truely the first RJ.
 
Theres no such thing as a "regional" jet beyond just marketing. I fly a CRJ-200 on routes over 1000 miles long. I fly them from a major hub to major cities. I'm in and out of Class B all day long every day. Theres nothing "regional" about what we do besides that its in the "region" of North America.

They're "outsourced" jets... plain and simple. Maybe I should start calling my CRJ the COJ.

The DC-9 may be a "regional" jet, but who cares about labels. Does it have a "regional" pay scale?

RJ actually means Replacement Jet! ;-)
 
And the really cool thing about it is that the crew probably had about three times the purchasing power that pilots with the same number of seats behind them do today.

Oh yeah....the flight attendants fit in the aisles too.
 
The DC-9 was one of the best jets I have flown.
 
the regionals suck at life. if you fy for a regional, i instruct you to punch yourself in the face. i can say this cause i just got home from the baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar.
 
Nope, we pilots are the ones that suck at respecting our profession by allowing the separation of the pilot workforce into classes
 
Don't forget the massive governmental price-fixing and subsidies to guarantee profits to the carriers doing these short runs with big airplanes.

I don't miss the smoking sections. :puke:
 
The B-737 was also initially promoted as a Regional Jet. It had big main tires and was designed to land and takeoff in short and unimproved fields.

Interestingly enough, at some point, Delta and other airlines were using them to fly across country on longer routes that had been flown by Convair 880's, DC-8's and 727's. Just as today's RJ, they were used on longer thinner routes after deregulation and the end of government subsidized air fares.
 
Isn't there a part in Flying the Line about ALPA fighting to keep the 9 and 737 a three crew flightdeck? I'm not an expert on the 737-100, but were any or all of those made with an FE station?

Here's my question then- should the CRJ-1000 be a three crew aircraft? The question I pose is a joke, curious to see how many uptighters on here will go nuts about it.
 
No, the B737 and DC9 were always 2 pilot airplanes....

ALPA wanted the rule that any plane over 80K gross had to have a flight engineer. They wanted to enforce the rule and have a pilot sit there and pick his nose and PAY DUES!

A350
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom