CFI2766
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2005
- Posts
- 1,293
People forget.............
18 year EMB-145 CA pay at AE is LESS than 3rd year 767/A300 FO pay. 757 pay is about the same.
AA has the same domiciles as AE (minus SJU, plus DCA, SFO, and STL). I don't buy the QOL/commuting reason for not wanting to flow.
The work rules at AA are about 10x better than at AE.
They've got a pension.
There are solutions that can be reached here.
1. Send AE flowthrus to AA at current pay (would cost AMR NOTHING since they'd be paying them all that hourly rate anyway if they stayed at AE). Then all 400+ FTs would probably go.
And........
2. Withhold AE flowthrus at AE until they can hold the domicile of their choice at AA.
That'd probably take care of everything.
This solves the AE problem, but how is this fair to the guys already at AA? If I am a new-hire at AA, I want the same pay that the other new hires at AA will get, even if they are coming over from AE.
This is like saying an 18 year Comair guy should get 18 year Delta pay from day one of basic indoc at Delta. NOOOO way is that fair.
No, it seems as though AE did the right thing a while ago when it offered a career type of position in the regional airline industry. Now, frankly, because every other regional has undercut them, including the one I work for, they are finding themselves at a competitive disadvantage. This is unfortunate, but the only fair thing for AE to do is to honor their contract with the pilots who did nothing wrong other than to do what the company asked of them.
Last edited: