But didn't the transcripts state that Skywest finances SAPA 100%?
There's no debate as to who finances SAPA. The company doesn't try to hide the fact that they finance it 100%. The Company's position is that somehow, them financing it 100% isn't a conflict of interest, that's the real mind-blower.
As far as who to vote for, my perspective is that a vote for JB is a vote for status quo. I, too, voted for MN and think he could have done some substantial things for this pilot group had he not been effectively hamstrung by JB, ME, etc. As for MN, at least he's in a better place now.
If you don't support SAPA, abstaining from the vote is a message, but not a very clear one. I think SGU sees a 40% voter turnout as an indication that the pilots are happy and don't care what happens, knowing that their future is secure in the hands of their gracious, SGU overlords.
On the other hand, a 100% voter turnout with 99.9% voting for BS, is a clear message that this group is rejecting our current leadership. Isn't that a valuable message to convey?
Is BS a new beginning for SAPA? I don't think so. I've talked to him and consider him to be generally honest, but like most SAPA reps and board members, I think he's probably convinced that we are being treated about as well as we can expect. I disagree, but I think his attitudes are less dangerous than the alternative.
If you want to see real changes, contact an ALPA Organizing Committee member, volunteer and be a part of the solution.
For the SkyWest haters out there, it is kind of sad that we have to resort to unofficial means of communication, but the company is in charge here and communicating with us is not always their top priority.
As for the ALPA vote, the drive is progressing and far from stagnant.