Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Lo and behold, Forklift Joe running into same problem as Oak Creek Timmy

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I wouldn't say its the same problem as Oak Creek Timmey.... Oak Creek Timmey is trying to make a profit, any profit.... While Joe Leonard is probably dealing with record profits at AAI.... Oh ya, record load factors for June and Q2 as well.. Face it... Midwest is a gonner, and your gonna be working for "forklift Joe".. Better get used to it, or start sending out your resumes..
 
If you would have done your homework, you have seen that Airtran's average stage length increased about 6% to 680 miles thus bring CASM and RASM down. As long as RASM is higher than CASM (something Midwest has had trouble figuring out over the last 5 years), we should be reporting a record quarter in a few weeks. Forklift Joe may not be the best with employee relations, but he hasn't done too shabby of job trippling the size of Airtran profitably over the last 8 years.
 
Something I don't understand about this business...

Everyone's load factors are way up there - why the heck can't we just increase ticket prices and make some mo money...
 
Because management has more fun squeezing it out of their employees. Ticket prices have come up a little. Southwest has raised prices as of late. Problem is, everyone else is trying not to, just to capture some of what has been lost to a LCC.

It is really odd that Midwest has these traffic problems WITHOUT competition. I can see in Airtran's case, pricing is crucial. My only guess is that the leisure flying market really is start to feel the gas prices, ARM's going up, etc., is really starting to hamper their spending habits. The first thing that gets shelved is vacation.
 
It is really odd that Midwest has these traffic problems WITHOUT competition. I can see in Airtran's case, pricing is crucial. My only guess is that the leisure flying market really is start to feel the gas prices, ARM's going up, etc., is really starting to hamper their spending habits. The first thing that gets shelved is vacation.

we're doing fine now with no bankruptcy in the past (how many carriers can say that). the SMART managers want NO COMPETITION on their route structure.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't say its the same problem as Oak Creek Timmey.... Oak Creek Timmey is trying to make a profit, any profit.... While Joe Leonard is probably dealing with record profits at AAI.... Oh ya, record load factors for June and Q2 as well.. Face it... Midwest is a gonner, and your gonna be working for "forklift Joe".. Better get used to it, or start sending out your resumes..

well midwest was making lots of money when you guys had the little blue smiley airplane on the sides and they are making money now. air tran is making record profits because it is growing and still young. holla back when you're 23 years old. they're making money now too and have it in unrestricted cash, while aai's cash is tied to airplane deliveries and operations (this is why AAI can afford this buyout as they are simply using MEH's cash on hand to finance it). you're financial picture ain't as rosey as you guys portray it.
 
Being on the bottom you should hope your future company doesn't furlough. You're the one who likes to bring up AA/TWA, right?!?

all things staying the same (ie no air tran), i do not see MEH furloughing in the near future. if they do, then you deal with it.

your analogy shows how stupid your point is. so i WANT to be furloughed by having AAI buy MEH? cause that's what happened with AA/TWA.
 
....As long as RASM is higher than CASM (something Midwest has had trouble figuring out over the last 5 years)....

and air tran too (p. 18 of the 2006 annual report) slick

2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
Passenger revenue per ASM(7) 9.56¢ 9.09¢ 8.39¢ 8.86¢ 8.64¢
Operating cost per ASM (CASM)(8) 9.74¢ 9.28¢ 8.45¢ 8.28¢ 8.51¢
 
all things staying the same (ie no air tran), i do not see MEH furloughing in the near future. if they do, then you deal with it.

your analogy shows how stupid your point is. so i WANT to be furloughed by having AAI buy MEH? cause that's what happened with AA/TWA.

You seem to get your jollies by posting negative tripe about AirTran, I still think it's funny you being midwest's #1 cheerleader and you are not even done with training, although your profile says you flown the 717 (maybe on the J/S?). Check back with us after you've flown the line, OK?
 
You seem to get your jollies by posting negative tripe about AirTran, I still think it's funny you being midwest's #1 cheerleader and you are not even done with training, although your profile says you flown the 717 (maybe on the J/S?). Check back with us after you've flown the line, OK?

so you lose an argument through your bad analogy and resort to this? ha! jollies about negative airtran no. it's you guys who post the midwest "growth rj plan" and kharma dictates airtrans growth plan via rj's. it's you guys who post the lowered MEH 2nd qtr estimate and when kharma shows airtran is doing the same darn (or should i say daggumb to fit in at ATL) thing you say i get my jollies? i am simply responding to your woodies about a MKE domicile for airtran.

i flew the line before. i know what a bad situation is. midwest/airtran is certainly not that. a 717 flies no differently than the crj and is easier to fly than a 1900. flying the line at MEH is certainly better than flying the line at the regionals. but to satisfy your thirst, i will change my profile.

again worry about your contract, follow lear70's excellent lead, and not about us in MKE.

MEH cheerleader? I do like the general lee of meh!
http://www.denham.us/fretwork-cheerleader.jpg
 
Last edited:
so you lose an argument through your bad analogy and resort to this? ha! jollies about negative airtran no. it's you guys who post the midwest "growth rj plan" and kharma dictates airtrans growth plan via rj's. it's you guys who post the lowered MEH 2nd qtr estimate and when kharma shows airtran is doing the same darn (or should i say daggumb to fit in at ATL) thing you say i get my jollies? i am simply responding to your woodies about a MKE domicile for airtran.

i flew the line before. i know what a bad situation is. midwest/airtran is certainly not that. a 717 flies no differently than the crj and is easier to fly than a 1900. flying the line at MEH is certainly better than flying the line at the regionals. but to satisfy your thirst, i will change my profile.

again worry about your contract, follow lear70's excellent lead, and not about us in MKE.

MEH cheerleader? I do like the general lee of meh!
http://www.denham.us/fretwork-cheerleader.jpg

So, I guess still in training? Anyway, my point was that either way you are going to be at the bottom of AirTran's or Midwest's senority list, it's not like you have alot to lose senority wise. Since AirTran will more than likely acquire Midwest, it is in your best interests for AirTran to succeed. As far as "worrying about our contract", given your numerous post regarding the AirTran contract negotiations, one would of thought you worked for us, (you had more posts on the topic than most other AirTran pilots and me), so much for minding your own house. BTW I personally like Midwest, I think they have a great product, but I think the Midwest acquisition is a bad idea for AirTran for reasons I have already stated.

P.S. The 717 flies differently then the CRJ, control tabs versus hydraulic flight controls. Good luck on IOE!
 
Last edited:
So, I guess still in training? Anyway, my point was that either way you are going to be at the bottom of AirTran's or Midwest's senority list, it's not like you have alot to lose senority wise. Since AirTran will more than likely acquire Midwest, it is in your best interests for AirTran to succeed. As far as "worrying about our contract", given your numerous post regarding the AirTran contract negotiations, one would of thought you worked for us, (you had more posts on the topic than most other AirTran pilots and me), so much for minding your own house. BTW I personally like Midwest, I think they have a great product, but I think the Midwest acquisition is a bad idea for AirTran for reasons I have already stated.

P.S. The 717 flies differently then the CRJ, control tabs versus hydraulic flight controls. Good luck on IOE!

trust me, if the deal happens i will support airtran. but some of us like the small airline feel and came here primarily cause of that. if the airtran deal happens, then i will deal with that. i agree i really have nothing to lose except those newhires at AAI coming after my hiredate (some already).

of course i worry about your TA. it highlights what may happen if and when we are bought and how our merged contract will perhaps look.

so far i enjoy the mcboeing experience.
 
Simma, guys, simma... ;)

I actually don't think you'll lose a lot of that "small airline feel" after the deal. Very few AAI guys want to head north and not too many MEH guys seem to want to drift south.

I do hope that we can pick up some of the Midwest customer service - something many of our gate agents and customer service folk seem to lack, despite all efforts by corporate to train it into them (give 'em the pickle). :)

As far as the CRJ versus the 717. The 717 is easier from a flying standpoint once you get the goofy thing programmed and airborne. Dang thing nearly flies itself... Landing is another story. Getting consistently good landings in the 717 is a lot easier said than done, and this is my 3rd Boeing.

Negotiations and the T.A.? Don't get me started...
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom