Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

80-100hrs of IOE at mesa??

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
While absurd, at least give credit to Mesa for simply NOT sticking these guys out on the line after 30 hours or so by lowering their qual standards. At least they have the insight to acknowledge the problem with hiring such inexperienced problems and put forth the proper time to train them. It's certainly not as if they want to hire such incompetence, but they've got a business to run, and I'm glad to hear that are putting in the time to run is safely, which is my utmost concern when flying.
 
The supply is weak compared to demand, therefore the value of the supply and competition for it is greater.

ECON 101

Exactly.... what would the supply be like if the entry requirements were higher? If the minimums were 1200 hours, then none of the regionals would be filling classes right now....

What would they do then.... they would raise their pay until they could fill their classes....

ECON 101 indeed..... Supply and demand.... We need to tighten the supply more....
 
That would be nice. . . now I understand your point. It'll be an interesting few years ahead.
 
Last edited:
While absurd, at least give credit to Mesa for simply NOT sticking these guys out on the line after 30 hours or so by lowering their qual standards. At least they have the insight to acknowledge the problem with hiring such inexperienced problems and put forth the proper time to train them. It's certainly not as if they want to hire such incompetence, but they've got a business to run, and I'm glad to hear that are putting in the time to run is safely, which is my utmost concern when flying.

Oh, trust me. It's not Mesa who decided to increase IOE. It is the check-airmen there who are risking their jobs fighting Mesa to be able to give extra IOE.
 
My parents didn't raise me to be the type of person that backs down from what he believes in. Sorry, but I refuse to put my tail between my legs on this.


My parents didn't raise me to pick a fight I couldn't win.... Don't show up to a gun fight with a knife...

I'm not backing down Stifler, I want to fight from a stronger postion than we currently have..... You have been listening to the ALPA chest thumpers too much...

ALPA needs to approach this fight differently than they are currently doing... The current approach isn't working...

Don't tuck and run, but dont cut your own nuts off either....
 
Some 1500 hour wundercaptain nervous? they don't know enough to be nervous!

Mesa's upgrades have slowed to a crawl. The whole idea was to get in, get your PIC time and get out. Now that process is pushing 3 years minimum, closer to 4.

Mesa is a sinking ship.
 
I've been hearing of FNGs with 20 plus sim sessions before passing the checkride. Scary.
 
...yet these crews mostly don't crash!

possibly thanks to the Wonder of Modern Technology?

Flight Directors?

Radar Altimeters? (Just flare when it sez "10")

?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top