Sluggo_63
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2003
- Posts
- 332
It wasn't .19 per share, it was .06 per share.Our relative health is really shown by the .19 per share profit.
You have to be fair both ways.
I like you guys. In previous quarters, when people posted "well, SWA would have lost money without hedges," I agree with you guys that the answer is "doesn't matter... we have the hedges."
You can't turn around now and say, "well, if we didn't have the write-off on the hedges, we would have made .19." You did have the write off and you made .06 per share. At least play by the same rules quarter to quarter.
You guys are fine. Don't worry. Just be honest on here.