MYFpilot
SDSU Super Fan
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2001
- Posts
- 273
...and the pilot agreement needed to be changed,
You mean "contract", when refering to Expressjet pilots. It's the SkyWest pilots that have an "agreement". A minor but important point.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
...and the pilot agreement needed to be changed,
You mean "contract", when refering to Expressjet pilots. It's the SkyWest pilots that have an "agreement". A minor but important point.
True, they didn't have to. But it was a major factor that the XJT BOD took into consideration when they decided to turn down the offer. Had the pilots been onboard with it, I would guess that the deal would have went through at the original proposed price.
You mean "contract", when refering to Expressjet pilots. It's the SkyWest pilots that have an "agreement". A minor but important point.
Again, here you go with the "my chitty regional airline job is better than yours" argument. You can bet you bottom dollar(and you have). CAL took the lowest price deal they could.PBR
I would agree with you except for one thing. The XJT BOD turned down the first offer before the pilots knew anything about either the offer, or its requirements to change the CBA. The official line was, and remains, that stockholders didn't get enough $$$ from the deal.
Stock worth $1.15 right now. JA offered three times that initially. I maintain that XJT tried to holdout for a better offer and never got one. Kind of like the Twins did with Santana this past off-season. Also, like the Santana deal, when the crunch was on the offers became less.
Regardless, the BOD knew the pilots would not accept the deal, as stated in the 8k filing, so their hands were pretty much tied in that aspect.
And my question still is, How much is it gonna cost you guys?CAL got what they wanted. They no longer have to feel like they are subsidizing the branded side of the operation, and they get control back of at least 29 of 69 airframes they gave up in Dec 2006.
Kinda thought that is what I said. Can no one get in the last word with you?![]()
And my question still is, How much is it gonna cost you guys?
PBR
Now, had the pilots accepted JA offer, would it have left you open for whipsaw? Sure. I believe it would have, too. Would it have actually happened? All you can do is speculate. See, I don't drink the kool-aid as much as you think.
And my question still is, How much is it gonna cost you guys?
PBR
Ah, but speculation is so much fun. Recent history may answer the question of what would have happened. Did ASA grow, shrink, or stagnate after the SKW buyout? Is the change at ASA commensurate with the change at SKW?
If there was no intention of using the whipsaw, then there would have been no need to ask for changes to the CBA.
Did they not complete their contract?
Is ASA not the most improved airline over the past 6 months? Are they not enjoying bonus checks and such? Did they not complete their contract?
ASA needed a complete overhaul of their management and operations. Now that they have begun to do that, I feel they are in an excellent position to be a player in the market for any future growth there may be.
I believe that Stifler's Mom and USCTrojan would agree.
Is ASA not the most improved airline over the past 6 months? Are they not enjoying bonus checks and such? Did they not complete their contract?
ASA needed a complete overhaul of their management and operations. Now that they have begun to do that, I feel they are in an excellent position to be a player in the market for any future growth there may be.
Mmmm...pudding sounds goooood.Speedtape agrees! Not ready to sip the Kool-Aid yet but the PROOF IS in the Pudding! Give me a spoon-- the Kool-Aid is next!