Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

WSJ slams Colgan (5/11)

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I think the most damning part of the story is they don't train a response to a stick pusher in the sim. Face it, a low time in model Captain, in icing conditions, at low altitude has the nose of the airplane push over. How do you think he is going to react, especially if he hasn't been trained?

Sure he had some training problems. However, its beginning to look more like a Training Department problem.
 
Buy or sell your statement? I'm not buying...your comment suggest that a majority fail their type ride..simply not true...

I don't think he was suggesting that a MAJORITY fail their type rides -- just that a lot of pilots have a bust or two on their records by the time they make Captain.

That said, FIVE busts (3 pre-121, 2 during 121) seems to be lot for anybody.
 
Sure he had some training problems. However, its beginning to look more like a Training Department problem.

Colgan's canned response is "we meet or exceed all federal training requirements."

And that is true.

So, is the problem with Colgan, or the Feds? I would argue the underlying problem is the standards set forth by the FAA.
 
That would be the old "if the minumum wasn't good enough, it wouldn't be the minimum" argument. True. However, you can bump standards up to the point where NO ONE can pass.

And then there's the law of supply and demand. We're talking the regionals here. Just last spring, they were hiring 500/50. You can't give those guys a NASA checkride. When there's lots of job candidates you can be stricter.

The telling point is that Colgan has "fired" Check Airmen and had a couple big Kahunas in the Training Department "resign". You don't think there was a little FAA pressure to make that happen? Slack standards have come home to roost, apparently.
 
Capt. Renslow, 47, joined Colgan in September 2005 after graduating from a pilot-training academy, employment records show. He had a history of flunking check rides -- periodic tests of competency that are also required anytime a pilot begins flying a new type of aircraft. Before joining Colgan, he failed three proficiency checks on general aviation aircraft administered by the FAA, according to investigators and the airline.

Did this guy first start flying in his early 40's at some sort of ALLATPs bridge program for Colgan?

I hate to be a wet blanket, but what is your opinion on guys who begin flight training (with the goal to become a professional pilot) at such a late age. The mind does not absorb information or training like it does as a teen/ early 20's student. Your attitudes and perceptions are much different between those two ages.
 
Last edited:
Did this guy first start flying in his early 40's at some sort of ALLATPs bridge program for Colgan?

I hate to be a wet blanket, but what is your opinion on guys who begin flight training (with the goal to become a professional pilot) at such a late age. The mind does not absorb information or training like it does as a teen/ early 20's student. Your attitudes and perceptions are much different between those two ages.
That is a good point. However I used to fly with a guy that started at 45. He is extremely sharp. I think he may be the exception and not the norm.
 
Maybe this will raise awareness in our favor regarding pilot pay and a shortage of QUALIFIED pilots. Bottom feeder airlines can sometimes only hire those pilots who are lacking in skills and are willing to accept lower pay and substandard work rules to get themselves into the seat of an airliner.

We know that the most competitive jobs are those with high paying position such as most majors (SWA, DAL, FedEx, UPS come to mind.) Their screening practices make it almost impossible for someone with such a terrible pass/fail record to ever get hired. Yet bottom-feeders such as Pinnacle, Colgan, Gulfstream, etc will look the other way and hire these pilots and also pay them rock bottom wages.

If the general flying public knew of these practices, they would almost be affraid of flying on a network carrier's regional partner who starts their pilots pay at 19K for the first year. The only people willing to take that abuse are the 250 hr wonders and the pilots with a shaky flying background.

I see you have CL-65 and B-1900 time. Does that mean you fall into the "shaky background" category?
 
Maybe this will raise awareness in our favor regarding pilot pay and a shortage of QUALIFIED pilots. Bottom feeder airlines can sometimes only hire those pilots who are lacking in skills and are willing to accept lower pay and substandard work rules to get themselves into the seat of an airliner.

We know that the most competitive jobs are those with high paying position such as most majors (SWA, DAL, FedEx, UPS come to mind.) Their screening practices make it almost impossible for someone with such a terrible pass/fail record to ever get hired. Yet bottom-feeders such as Pinnacle, Colgan, Gulfstream, etc will look the other way and hire these pilots and also pay them rock bottom wages.

If the general flying public knew of these practices, they would almost be affraid of flying on a network carrier's regional partner who starts their pilots pay at 19K for the first year. The only people willing to take that abuse are the 250 hr wonders and the pilots with a shaky flying background.

That is completely wrong. There are thousands of us who were low timers. Yes it's unfortunate that we will never know the joy of flying 1 hour around the airport pattern 1000 times on a 172s right seat but we all can sure as hell fly an airliner well.

This guy had a bunch of failures in his flight training we don't know what the terms were or if indeed Colgan would or could have known as there are loop holes to that. Internal fail rates do not matter to the company as long as the person ends up passing. I don't know maybe he should have went to a nice RJ airline where on the check irde the jet flys itself instead of going to a place like colgan if he knew that he wasn't a very good pilot. Who knows. But please don't generalize the rest of us.

By the way there is no such thing as low tiimers anyways. The last low timer was hired early 08 it's now almost mid 09.
 
...and not a word about a system that turns this kind of flying into nothing more than a commodity produced and sold by the low bidder. An accident like this was inevitable.
 
Maybe this will raise awareness in our favor regarding pilot pay and a shortage of QUALIFIED pilots. .

Way to generalize while at the same time contributing absolutely nothing.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top