Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Wow, Delta's Earnings

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Delta is paying to early out of some 50 seat lift and "upgauge" to larger aircraft (including the B717). Southwest is paying to early out some 120 seat lift and "upgauge" to larger B737-700s and -800s. Southwest and Delta aren't the only two airlines "upgauging" right now due to higher fuel prices. What is your point General?

Paying to early out 50 seaters? You mean the manufacturers are taking a bunch of them to secure a fewer number of larger RJs. FEWER...... But, then mainline comes in and adds 88 717s, and recaptures current 70/76 seater routes. Most of the routes will continue, on larger planes. You are dropping 17 total cities, gone. One airline is replacing planes with larger ones to build up routes, and the other is willing to cut and run from 17 communities.


Bye Bye---General Lee
 
Not every plane can fit on every route, Wave. Southwest didn't want 717s, so they are paying DL to get rid of them. As a result, SWA is dropping 17 cities that AT used to fly to. Obviously, SWA 737s can't make money on all routes.

Hawaiian will be outsourcing to several islands using Empire Airlines, utilizing ATR-42s. Even though they used to fly DC9s to Lanai and Molokai, and used to fly Dash-7s into those two and Kapalua, they will now use ATRs flown by Empire. Hawaiian Airlines made the decision to return to those cities, but at a certain price. Should Hawaiian avoid those 3 airports if they can't afford putting mainline planes (717s) into Lanai, Molokai, and Kapalua (couldn't handle a 717 anyway)??? SWA doesn't seem to care about those 17 ex AT cities, but the 3 in Hawaii might make a difference for Hawaiian.



Bye Bye---General Lee

I agree with you mostly Lee but most of the routes flown by 50 seat jets were once served by much larger mainline planes. Just around MSP even the small towns of LSE, RST, FSD, the list goes on were all served by mainline. The difference being the frequency and profit margin the mainline carriers can get with cheaper labor. The small jets serve a purpose, but the mainline carriers used bankruptcy and legacy pilots greed and ego to accomplish their goal.
 
Paying to early out 50 seaters? You mean the manufacturers are taking a bunch of them to secure a fewer number of larger RJs. FEWER...... But, then mainline comes in and adds 88 717s, and recaptures current 70/76 seater routes. Most of the routes will continue, on larger planes. You are dropping 17 total cities, gone. One airline is replacing planes with larger ones to build up routes, and the other is willing to cut and run from 17 communities.


Bye Bye---General Lee
Go take a look at Delta's Q3 and Q4 2012 earnings releases. There are some one time expenses above $100 million for each quarter with respect to Comair shutdown (ie a bunch of 50 seaters) and domestic fleet restructuring. So Delta will "eat" some one time expenses to get rid of 50 seat CRJs early while Southwest will "eat" a one time expense to get rid of some 120 seat BRJs. Both Richard Anderson and Gary Kelly feel it is worth the one time expense to increase their average seats per departure of their domestic fleet.

What is the big deal about dropping routes like AVL-MCO, LEX-MCO, and ATL-ACY and reallocating the lift to DEN-SJD, SNA-MEX, and MDW-CUN? Sounds like good revenue management to me. Southwest's goal is to make a profit. I know that may be foreign to you since Delta's goal is marketshare.
 
Go take a look at Delta's Q3 and Q4 2012 earnings releases. There are some one time expenses above $100 million for each quarter with respect to Comair shutdown (ie a bunch of 50 seaters) and domestic fleet restructuring. So Delta will "eat" some one time expenses to get rid of 50 seat CRJs early while Southwest will "eat" a one time expense to get rid of some 120 seat BRJs. Both Richard Anderson and Gary Kelly feel it is worth the one time expense to increase their average seats per departure of their domestic fleet.

What is the big deal about dropping routes like AVL-MCO, LEX-MCO, and ATL-ACY and reallocating the lift to DEN-SJD, SNA-MEX, and MDW-CUN? Sounds like good revenue management to me. Southwest's goal is to make a profit. I know that may be foreign to you since Delta's goal is marketshare.

How many of the FL communities were dropped completely Max? 17. You guys are DROPPING 17 total. DL very rarely does that, primarily because of the different sized planes that can be tried. Some to Europe are seasonal, but usually return for Spring/Summer. A few have been dropped to Europe in favor of the codeshares, but not 17.

And please don't try to compare profits MAX. DL's 2nd quarter profit will probably be larger than SWA's full year. Bag fees, like the ones you guys still feed SWA to fund your merger, really help. You may have to paint over a bunch of the SWA 737s that say "Bags fly free here." Otherwise, management may look for other ways to increase profitability. You know, SWA isn't really a LCC anymore, longevity is starting to affect the bottom line. Not as many new hires over there, and your certain stagnation will not help the situation. I would be "for" extra fees if I were you.

Btw, have you seen pictures of the DL 717 in the MIA paint shop? It looks pretty good, and it will pay well. ($195 an hour for 12th year longevity, or almost all the captains, by 2015 when they will all be on the property, and that will be the smallest plane at DL)


Bye Bye---General Lee
 
Last edited:
DL very rarely does that, primarily because of the different sized planes that can be tried.

Bye Bye---General Lee

What?

I guess your right General. Delta hasn't 'officially' closed cities like CVG and MEM but just continued to outsource them to some carriers with Connection in their name.

So how many departures has both CVG and MEM lost in the past 4 years? Mainline flights please. Those numbers have to be pretty stark.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top