Flying Illini
Hit me Peter!
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2003
- Posts
- 2,291
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Should implies you should, but you might not! I don't think fighting to save my life in the Atlantic is worth it to me to be wrong! I'm all for a little adventure and fun, but when you weigh risk vs. benefit - this whole process doesn't seem that necessary for me!Flying Illini said:Take the proper precautions and you should be ok.
If you take a northerly route the longest over-water distance is roughly 600 NM - certainly a doable distance for many light aircraft. Certainly there are many singles that make the trip without incident each year. There are also several cases of singles having to ditch in open water each year. Statisically, you can make the trip without expectations of problems - after all, how many engine failures are you going to experience? I've got my share of oceanic crossing under my belt and I've looked down on the North Atlantic and wondered how Lindberg had the cajones to take that trip - looking down at scattered icebergs in whitecapped waters takes away any desire that I might have in making the trip in a single. Even with a survival suit, your life expectency isn't very long. The suit would probably only prolong the inevitable.UnAnswerd said:User, interesting links. I didn't even think a C-150 had that type of range. How many miles are we talking here???
Yeah, but when the horse croaked, they just pulled over and ate it... When the engine dies and you are bobbing in the North Atlantic, you are dinner...Kream926 said:think about the old days and tha nads the settlers did years ago crossin the country with only 1 horse
Cool; who do you work for to do that, Socata? Also, what kind of times are they looking for for that?siucavflight said:I have nine Atlantic crossings in a TBM 700, did not even break a sweat.
User997 said:Should implies you should, but you might not! I don't think fighting to save my life in the Atlantic is worth it to me to be wrong! I'm all for a little adventure and fun, but when you weigh risk vs. benefit - this whole process doesn't seem that necessary for me!
Besides, I'm one of those people that is always the "1" in the 99 out of a 100 people statements. If it can happen, it probably will happen with me. I know my limitations based on that theory!
johnpeace said:Because I've had an alternator/total electrical failure on an XC flight before. Over the ocean, at night, 1200nm from my alternate, with no real navigation on board (ok, presumably I have a handheld GPS for this trip) doesn't sound worth whatever I'm being paid to make this flight.
KeroseneSnorter said:Turbine, probably....with a survival suit on the entire time over water, North atlantic waters are Cold! Very Cold!........
AdlerDriver said:Hitting the water after an ejection, the general gouge when I was doing it was the survival suit might buy you an extra 15 minutes. Maybe civilians have better suits - you know the rep of government issued stuff. If you could get in and stay in your raft, you might have a chance. If the water was rough, most guys figured they'd be better off just unzipping the suit so they could go quickly. It was going to take a while for some helo out of Kef to get there and find you (maybe).