Re: TXCAP
I still think you have missed my point.
prodigal said:
The original poster was in no way evangelizing nor trying to "cram" anything down anyone's throat. Nor do I see how someone's Christian auto signature could be offensive.
You are right on both counts. That's my whole point. If the original poster can make a statement that he believes in god or is blessed and it not be offensive, then somebody else can make a reply to that which says "you know, I disagree with you on that and am not a Christian at all" and that's not offensive either.
I'm saying that YOU ARE CALLING IT OFFENSIVE AND DISRESPECTFUL
for the sole reason that it is in disagreement with you. But that doesn't MAKE it offensive and disrespectful.
prodigal said:
You may not like it, but if not, just ignore it. Who would deny the right of someone to have it? Why this visceral reaction?
There are those here who are as fanatical in their attack of Christians and other religions as the "religious fanatics" they insist on attacking.
The core of my disagreement with you is that you categorize someone who disagrees with you as intolerant or visceral
solely because they disagree with you. I say that just because someone disagrees with you doesn't make them uncivil or intolerant or visceral. It just means they disagree with you.
Now, you say that there are people who are fanatical about "attacking" christians or other religions. No one who has posted on this thread has attacked have they? They have all said they disagree with you, but that's not an attack, that's a disagreement.
Snakum was a smart-@ss but I thought what he said was pretty funny. In any case, even though I don't really think he needed to he apologized for it. But even still, he didn't
attack you or christianity did he? Certainly no more than you have attacked any of us for saying that you believe.
Fly safe everybody, 5:30(AM) will be here awfully early and I need some sleep.