Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Who will be Southwest's merger partner?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I still think the best bet is Alaska. And I just thought of ANOTHER reason:

LUV gets 100+ 737s, 1500+ qualified pilots AND 100 options on the Boeing line.

If you call Boeing and ask for a 737 today, they say, "When in 2014 would you like to take delivery?"
 
If you call Boeing and ask for a 737 today, they say, "When in 2014 would you like to take delivery?"

Unfortunately, they can now say "call AirTran, they're selling a bunch of them." :rolleyes:
 
I still think the best bet is Alaska. And I just thought of ANOTHER reason:

LUV gets 100+ 737s, 1500+ qualified pilots AND 100 options on the Boeing line.

If you call Boeing and ask for a 737 today, they say, "When in 2014 would you like to take delivery?"

However, by adding Alaska's 737s you also add the -800s and 900s that require four flight attendants instead of three. So what? Well that adds complexity and inefficiencies to schedules, crew costs go up and it fundamentally changes the way they can schedule crews. Also Alaskas operations in the state of Alaska are expensive and are usually the cause of serious headaches with the entire operation during the winter time. Efficiency goes out the window. Also the freighter/combi aircraft cannot be turned efficiently due to pallet loading. Just my two cents.

Actually delivery slots are available. Just because there are hundreds on order doesn't mean they are all wanted now. Many us airlines are delaying deliveries. American was able to increase their deliveries for this year and next.
 
However, by adding Alaska's 737s you also add the -800s and 900s that require four flight attendants instead of three. So what? Well that adds complexity and inefficiencies to schedules, crew costs go up and it fundamentally changes the way they can schedule crews.

Just because the retards in marketing and crew planning at the two AAG regional airlines can't find their own backsides with both hands and detailed map doesn't mean SWA suffers from the same lack of imagination and ability.
 
And some of those TWA pilots lost 15 years of seniority. That number is worth very little.

Thanks again APA.

I'm not saying it's the greatest thing ever, but it is much better than the Skullfcuk the ATA guys got.......
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom