Frmr Avro Drvr
Active member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2004
- Posts
- 42
I have a student that is trying to justify to his employer that expecting him to finish in 40 hours is a pretty high bar to set. He is arguing that he can reasonably do it in 50 to 55 and would like reimbursement to that level. If he has to he will take the 40 hours worth of money since free money is free money, but why not try for more.
What he is really trying to show is that the 40 hour rule has been around for a while and the requirements for tasks and training has increased. He is trying to show that the industry advertised average of 55 to 70 is correct.
Any of you "more mature" types remember when 40 hours became the minimum?
Thanks
What he is really trying to show is that the 40 hour rule has been around for a while and the requirements for tasks and training has increased. He is trying to show that the industry advertised average of 55 to 70 is correct.
Any of you "more mature" types remember when 40 hours became the minimum?
Thanks