Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

What's Really Wrong With The Airline Industry - And Can It Be Fixed?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Old School 737

NG's now and it is A OK!!
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Posts
986
What's Really Wrong With The Airline Industry - And Can It Be Fixed?
posted on: May 27, 2008 | about stocks: AMR / CAL / DAL / LCC / LUV / NWA / UAUA

Anyone flying in today’s environment does not need the media or statistics to know that the industry has terrible customer service, packed and dirty aircrafts and the worst on-time performance since data has been recorded.

There is nothing simple about putting hundreds of lives into an aluminum tube using jet engines to propel it 35,000 feet above the ground, traveling close to the speed of sound, to eventually land safely on a stretch of concrete most anywhere in the World. US airline employees assume responsibility for the safe operation of over 20,000 flights each and every day which routinely deal with any type of weather and mechanical failure imaginable.

Make no mistake about it, flying is dangerous. It is made less dangerous by the dedicated men and women who always put the safety of their passengers as their number one priority. When an unexpected in-flight emergency occurs, there is no shoulder on the road to pull over and call 911 and wait for help. It won’t make the media headlines today, but like every day, some pilot will use his/her training and experience to deal with an in-flight emergency that will save hundreds of lives. Every day licensed mechanics use their experience to repair some part of an aircraft to prevent a future tragedy. Like every day, flight attendants will use their training, experience and on board medical safety equipment to keep passengers alive after a heart attack and deal with a multitude of other in-flight emergencies.

I’m not here to defend major airlines' employees, but I can tell you in addition to compensation and benefits, nearly all labor contracts have rules and limitations that often exceed FAA minimums which, is in large part, the reason we have the safest airline system in the world. Over the past 7 years, in order to make up for the tremendous increase in fuel expense and financial losses from 911, employee labor contracts have been under brutal and incessant attack.

Never before in the history of the airline industry have airline employees been under more pressure to have zero tolerance for issues from “in flight security” to “safety of flight”. Yet, these same dedicated airline employees have seen their wages and work rules conceded to the standards of the early 90s, or eliminated entirely due to labor reductions.

It’s common to hear about the success of the Southwest (LUV) business model as compared to the rest of the airline industry. There should be no argument that Southwest is a well organized airline with great customer service. It’s also true without fuel hedging, Southwest would be losing money no less than many other airlines. Importantly, if all airlines copied the Southwest model, there would be no way to fly a US airline across any mainland border. Southwest operates primarily from lower cost outlying airports, often with no same airport connections for international travel. A considerable portion of the more productive Southwest business model comes from flying one type of aircraft in one class (coach) service providing minimal in-flight and connecting amenities, all while avoiding the high cost of international operations.

The US airline industry has seemingly become a mass transit system, frequently offering airfares that cost less than driving your car between the same two airports. If airline customers want a return to the times when aircrafts were new and operated with more empty seats, well rested and happy friendly employees and great customer service, it can only come at some financial cost. Most airlines now compete simply to stay alive as they are forced to provide competing and unprofitable air fares offered by a continuous rotation of new entry low cost airlines that show a constant history of failure. Unfortunately, in order to survive, capturing low fare market share has become a higher priority for airlines than customer service and new modern aircraft.

Below are some startling statistics comparing year 2007 to year 2000 for the 7 largest US major airlines. [American (AMR), United (UAUA), Delta (DAL), Continental (CAL), Northwest (NWA), US Airways (LCC) and Southwest (LUV) control 71% of the US market share.]

Total Operating Revenue was nearly the same at around $95 billion.
Capacity as measured by Available Seat Miles [ASMs] decreased by 7% (Southwest capacity increased by 66%).
In the past 7 years, the average one-way passenger fare has only increased by $18 (+11%) going from $153 to $171. (Note: This is the passenger revenue kept by the airlines and does not include large increases in taxes, fees security charges etc. that airlines are required to charge but do not keep.)
Fuel Expense increased by $15.5 billion (+128%) going from $12.1 billion to $27.6 billion.
Employee wage/salary expense decreased by $7.6 billion (-30%).
Employee wage/benefit percentage of operating revenue decreased by 22% going from 35% to 27%.
The labor cost of the average one-way passenger fare decreased by $25 (-41%) going from $60 to $35.
The fuel cost of the average one-way passenger fare increased by $34 (+154%) going from $22 to $56.
In the last 7 years over 162,000 jobs (-38%) have been eliminated from the largest 6 major airlines as they went from 430,000 to 268,000 employees. (Southwest had an increase of 5,000 employees ending 2007 with 34,378 employees).
While fuel costs rapidly increased and labor costs and total employment rapidly decreased, the average passenger ratio to airline employee increased by 430 (+36%) going from 1,198 to 1,628. In other words, that reservation or ticket agent or flight attendant must now, on average, resolve issues and provide customer service to 36% more passengers than they did seven years ago.
During this same time period the average revenue productivity per employee increased by an astounding $107,442 (+52%) going from $206,370 to $313,812.
Data is for mainline operations and does not include contracted affiliates. Source is SEC and BTS reports. (Some data may be estimated for 2007.)

While discussions address the question regarding what the problem is with the airline industry, itseems like a rather easy question to answer after you understand what has actually occurred.
 
Wow, someone in the media that actually does research before they write an article...amazing!
 
.......It’s common to hear about the success of the Southwest (LUV) business model as compared to the rest of the airline industry. There should be no argument that Southwest is a well organized airline with great customer service. It’s also true without fuel hedging, Southwest would be losing money no less than many other airlines. ...

A great article but as many, including many on FI, they still doesn't get it with regard to SWA. SWA WOULD NOT BE PRICING THE SAME WITHOUT FUEL HEDGES. They are using it as a competitive advantage to no doubt gain market share. I would argue that SWA would have been setting continually higher prices since 2001 had they not had fuel hedging, but they do, so it is an irrelevant argument. When you adjust for stage length SWA has the lowest costs. Period.
 
A great article but as many, including many on FI, they still doesn't get it with regard to SWA. SWA WOULD NOT BE PRICING THE SAME WITHOUT FUEL HEDGES. They are using it as a competitive advantage to no doubt gain market share. I would argue that SWA would have been setting continually higher prices since 2001 had they not had fuel hedging, but they do, so it is an irrelevant argument. When you adjust for stage length SWA has the lowest costs. Period.

Yes, and they also have the lowest costs while paying the highest pilot wages in the business.

It's majic!
 
It can be fixed. They, the airlines, SHOULD divide the #of gallons the aircraft burns per hour, divided by the # of pax multiplie by the #of hours flown, and add the fuel to the ticket price. It would work, sure it would be a little bit more for the customer to pay, but it would fix the revenue issue with the airlines.

also, it would have to be something that ALL airlines would be required to do by law, so you wouldn't get the MESA airline(s) of the industry from undercutting everyone else.

Basically, regulate the industry again.
 
This Industry is REGUALTED. Every aspect.

Except one. Fares.

As soon as the airlines were "de-regulated" their primary responsibility became the shareholder, not the public.

I think the experiment has failed.

Except for Southwest. Good for them. They will be the only airline left when this is over.

"Will you be traveling Southwest domestic or International today sir?"
 
What's Really Wrong With The Airline Industry - And Can It Be Fixed?
posted on: May 27, 2008 | about stocks: AMR / CAL / DAL / LCC / LUV / NWA / UAUA


Never before in the history of the airline industry have airline employees been under more pressure to have zero tolerance for issues from “in flight security” to “safety of flight”. Yet, these same dedicated airline employees have seen their wages and work rules conceded to the standards of the early 90s, or eliminated entirely due to labor reductions.

Informative article, although this 1 area can be misconstrued though. Our wages are not at the standards of the early 90's. dollar for dollar yes! But people have to understand the effects of inflation and increases to our cost of living. In actuality, our earning power is lower than it has ever been in the jet age, and probably even the history of airline travel!

As a matter of fact, APA is basing their current contract negotiations on their salary of 1992 plus a 2.5% increase each year from 1992 to 2008 as the salary they would like to see. And the startling fact is that it would amount to a 50% raise. Now I am sure inflation has run higher than an average of 2.5% over the past 15 years so basically our earning power is approximately HALF what it was in 1992, which by the way was also a difficult time in our economy. we certainly have a long way to go, and I fear we will never reach that again, but we MUST MUST stop the decline here and now. Be damn*ed with oil prices, enough is enough. It is high time prices are adjusted to make a profit at current labor costs. If an airline just can't do it, let it wither at the vine, quickly rather than slowly. I don't mean to be heartless but this has to come to a head. If it means 20-30% of our nations aircraft are parked and capacity is reduced the same, so be it. It will be difficult for those of us who will be out of work, possibly me as well, but it makes no sense to keep our careers limping along at this rate, while management has a field day.
 
Yes, and they also have the lowest costs while paying the highest pilot wages in the business.

It's majic!

You gotta be kidding me? You are the highest for 737 equipment because your company has succeeded in forcing everyone else to your level. Delta and United had contracts that would have paid 230 an hour for 737 equipment 7 YEARS AGO!!! And with their pay raises each year it would make swa the lowest once again as they always have been ever since they were created.

You really should be ashamed of yourself for making a comment like that. If you guys were the trailblazers like United was in 2000 then thats one thing but to sit by while you watch everyone fall below you THEN brag?? Pathetic and disgusting colonel. You are quite savage, kicking a man when he's down!
 
You are the highest for 737 equipment because your company has succeeded in forcing everyone else to your level.

That maybe a fair statement but what accounts for the fact that they are in today's market the highest paying? Why wouldn't DL/UA still pay higher then WN (though less then the 2000 levels you quoted).
 
That maybe a fair statement but what accounts for the fact that they are in today's market the highest paying? Why wouldn't DL/UA still pay higher then WN (though less then the 2000 levels you quoted).

Because they need to match southworsts and the other LCC's fares in order to keep from losing all their business, so they say. And these fares can't support decent wages.
 
The problem is the bankruptcy laws of the U.S.

If the airlines that had to go Chapter 11 had simply gone out of business and not allowed to shrug off their debt and tear up their contracts and then go out and and try again we would have had a MUCH stronger and profitable industry now.

Our bankruptcy laws have created a weak industry. If a business can't hack it, they should die out and let corporate Darwinism work.
 
The problem is the bankruptcy laws of the U.S.

If the airlines that had to go Chapter 11 had simply gone out of business and not allowed to shrug off their debt and tear up their contracts and then go out and and try again we would have had a MUCH stronger and profitable industry now.

Our bankruptcy laws have created a weak industry. If a business can't hack it, they should die out and let corporate Darwinism work.

Agreed. I understand the bankruptcy laws have changed, as evidenced by DAL and NWA filing the day before the change. Hopefully these new laws will cause the weak to wither at the vine this next wave of bankruptcy's. But then how much do ya want to make a bet the bottom feeders like swa and jb will come in and fill the lost capacity thereby preventing the survivors from charging a fare that can sustain a profit.
 
What's really happening, and what will cull the airlines, is the creditors are refusing to finance poor operations. That's what happened to all of the carriers that's shut down this year.

I think Citibank fronted UAL some $20 billion over a period of time.
 
Because they need to match southworsts and the other LCC's fares in order to keep from losing all their business, so they say. And these fares can't support decent wages.

But WN supports higher wages with lower ticket prices today. I can understand to an extent that pay dropped because of the LCC's. Now they are established in the marketplace though there should be parity between pay. Instead the LCC's are generally paying better then the majors.

A good argument can be made that pay level dropped because of competition with the LCC's but they have been in the marketplace for a long time now. I don't think the reason why major XYZ pays $50 an hour less the WN though is the fault of WN today.
 
Because they need to match southworsts and the other LCC's fares in order to keep from losing all their business, so they say. And these fares can't support decent wages.

You need to get over your hate of SWA and look at the facts. Pre-9/11 SWA had only about 5% of the domestic market share. I do not think that we had that much overall impact on most of the other carriers. I think it would be difficult for ExxonMobil to blame a small energy company for going out of business.

You have to get past the hourly pay rate. In 15+ years at SWA, mostof my friends have enjoyed higher rates of pay at the legacy carriers, yet they have made less due to the inefficient schedules. If you make 180/hr and only get paid for 3.5 while I make 150/hr for 6, I think that I win in the $ category. This can be done without a draconian schedule.

It is easy to brag about making 150K+ a year and only flying 400 hours a year, but you leave yourself wide open for someone to come along and do it better (more efficiently). The pay rate does affect the bottom line, but not nearly as much as how many you have to pay. The benefits and training costs can overtake an airlines ability to pay a better wage.
 
You need to get over your hate of SWA and look at the facts. Pre-9/11 SWA had only about 5% of the domestic market share.

And now they control the domestic market with over 50%. They are the ones most everyone must compete with but absolutely cannot in a hub and spoke network.

I do not think that we had that much overall impact on most of the other carriers. I think it would be difficult for ExxonMobil to blame a small energy company for going out of business.

southworst is not a small energy company. They are the largest domestic carrier in the country. Thanks to a 66% capacity increase in this decade while the network carriers have shrunk. The network carriers have tried to control capacity and raise fares to no avail. People flying out of the DC area will just go to BWI. People in Chicago area will just go to MDW. People in the SF area will just go to OAK. Dallas area, how about Love Field. You get the idea? Not to mention the places where they directly compete with the network carriers such as LAX, MCO, BNA, to name just a few. So you talk about not having much impact, well maybe that was true from that unfortunate day in 1971 until the 90s, but for the past 10+ years the impact has been immeasurable.

You have to get past the hourly pay rate. In 15+ years at SWA, mostof my friends have enjoyed higher rates of pay at the legacy carriers, yet they have made less due to the inefficient schedules. If you make 180/hr and only get paid for 3.5 while I make 150/hr for 6, I think that I win in the $ category. This can be done without a draconian schedule.

I'm not quite sure of the point you are trying to make here. But if I made 180 an hour I would be satisfied with a 60 to 70 hour line. But you say you guys can earn more at a lesser pay rate because you work more hours? Well of course! As much as I despise the southworst business model, I can agree with you that you all worked far greater hours than the network pilots did pre 9-11. We all don't always want to do 4-5 legs a day at 7-8 hours a day all the time. And as far as today, we are all working a southworst type schedule with 80-90 hour lines each month thanks to the necessity of having to compete with you. This excludes the transcon and international guys of course. The same guys that sell all the junior and domestic guys out all the time come contract negotiations because they don't want to risk their still cushy schedules!
 
pipjock, site your source for SWA having over 50% market share, I can only find SWA at 26% as recent as 2006. Interestingly, USair has 38%...
 
Pipe,

Like I said, you obvious hate won't let you see the facts. I have no idea where you get 50% from.

If you want to work more days for the same take home because you don't like the SWA schedule, more power to ya. I hope your airline can afford it, I really do.

BTW, for 2007, I averaged 3.1 legs per day.
 
I think Citibank fronted UAL some $20 billion over a period of time.

OK, if you're going to pull a number from your nether regions, the least you can do is make it halfway reasonable. UAUA's total debt is listed at $8.91B. Cite a source for this inflated number. Preferably UAUA's 10Q.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top