Veritas vos liberabit
smellthejeta said:
And frankly, I believe that your institution of higher educationisverygood at what it does, and has a unique combination ofstrongprogramsthat you can't find anywhere else. Had I known then whatIknow now, Iwould have selected Purdue for my undergraduate studies(forall kindsof reasons... I could have done the engineering thing,flew,and got myCTI training). Heck, I would have selected it for myCTItraining aswell most recently (in conjunction with a Master'sdegree),but you knowwhat Prof. Nolan (the guy who runs your CTIprogram andwrote a $100text book I had to buy) told me? If you wantto go be acontroller, gobe a controller. Don't come here and do aMaster's degree.It's likePilotYIP says about being a Pilot -- if youwanna be a pilot,go buildflight time. Don't horse around with anaeronautical sciencedegreethinking it will make you a better pilot orget you hired fasterthanPIC time.
As a current graduate student at Purdue I gotta interject and putsome perspective into what smellthejeta alluded to above. Wewould all agree that the advice given by Prof Nolan is reasonable atface value,however in looking just a little deeper you will discoverthe reasons why somebody in the position that he holds REALLY said whathe said to you.
Prof Nolan, privately, is not concerned with the airline hopefuls, heis concerned with kids like me, because we discovered the niche hediscovered 25 years ago and won't let go of it. "If you want to be acontroller be a controller???" Are you f'ing kidding me?!?! Listen,Mr.Nolan knows as much as I know, that I won't use the graduate degreeI'm currently pursuing for what the brochure says I'm supposed to useit for. You know what I will use it for? To get the job HE HAS. Andthat's WHY he is so animate about telling you to not get "distracted"with the pursuit of otherwise un-related graduate degrees in yourpursuit of the flying soda can. He knows his advice will completelyresonate as sound advice to the airline hopeful, since the airlinehopeful does not recognize or aspire to what I discovered, Prof.Nolan's job.
In other words, I will graduate by the end of the year with anunmarketable, yet highly technical and socially valuable masters inAero engineering, big freggin' deal right? Well, coupled with a BSinthe same AND the completion of my tickets, puts me where? knockingonthese professors's boots. Put in a couple of years flight instructingfor a university, combined with the aforementioned formal education andnot jumping ship for the peanut regionals puts me right in line forafaculty job where I can 1)make decent money and establishreputationand 2)continue to fly and enjoy what I truly love. The wasteof time istaking these professors' advice seriously. As for Purdue, Iresonatethe sentiment of others, I wouldn't do [flight training] ithere, I continue to pursue my ratings on the side on the small FBOscene,saving cash while I also complete the degree. Hell if it wasn'tfor the**CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED** National Guardbeing such a bitch I wouldn't even be doing Purdue at all right now,but paying the rent is another post altogether.
Is this path I've described for everybody? not at all, of course ProfNolan wants this to be the case badly and I understand it. But forsomebody (me) who ended up getting all this extra education and hasflying as his passion, beats the regionals and the cookie FBO gig by alongshot, a bonus for me since I never wanted the airline path andactually would get to instruct for a living in the air and intheclassroom while not looking at it like a stepping stone... andthat's good enough for me (was good enough for the Prof. Nolans of theworld)...Lets just take these people's advice with a grain of salt andnot gospel, in the end anybody with experience in aviation will tellyou finding a niche market is the way to attaining a balance betweenthe love we share for flying and putting food on the table.
Happy flying folks