Really? I don't think scope and size of RJs will be changed by the mainline pilots. Nah...
Bye Bye---General Lee
I never mentioned anything about scope or the size of RJs. Why did your mind go there?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really? I don't think scope and size of RJs will be changed by the mainline pilots. Nah...
Bye Bye---General Lee
I never mentioned anything about scope or the size of RJs. Why did your mind go there?
The same percentage of flying will be done by regionals as it is now. If you want to talk economics, why would Delta take back flying that is cheaper and they can cut back at any time with no cost? When they need to take seats away all they have to do is cut regional flying back. If that flying was "in house " they would still have to pay for planes, pilots ground crews, agents etc. The business model is brilliant but it includes a big dose of regionals and always will
Most lifers at the Regionals dream of larger RJs in the "long range plan." I pointed out that was unlikely given current scope and profits at the Legacies. I do hope the majority of Regional pilots who want to go to the Legacies land a job there someday soon. Freebrd, though, will continue to dump lavs with Mercyful Fate in Minot.
Bye Bye---General Lee
I agree that there will always be a need for some regional feed, certain cities cannot sustain a mainline sized jet. But, 88 717s coming in and 215 50 seaters leaving has created a large shift back towards mainline recapturing old routes. The model that worked for the Regionals in the last decade has gone by the wayside. Throw in new hiring standards (1500 or 800 from an approved facility) and new fatigue rules that get rid of something that made Regionals efficient, CDO's or "lean overs", and that side of the industry has really been changed forever. Less efficient means more expensive, and legacy partners don't seem to like that.