amcnd
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2003
- Posts
- 901
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I could be wrong, but wasn't the "2nd lowest cost at some future point" clause agreed to when SkyWest and Delta signed the major 15-year CPA, when SkyWest bailed out the bankrupt DL with several hundred million cash for ASA? I agree that was the start of DL b$tchslapping its subcontractors, but it appears to me that Jerry was not clever, in fact it looks like he got taken to the cleaners.Very true, and the time frame fits for what's happening now around the industry, especially with the proposed Express Jets TA. It appears that Express Jet and skywest will be whipsawed against each other to accommodate the up coming rate re-set. It is my opinion that it was the rate re-set agreement that sparked Delta's aggressive pressure on it's regional partners. Kind of cleaver for Skywest Inc. to agree to it. It essentially bought them more time.
Or you could be cynical and say that Jerry is doing just fine, he just threw his pilots under the bus in order to make the deal.
I could be wrong, but wasn't the "2nd lowest cost at some future point" clause agreed to when SkyWest and Delta signed the major 15-year CPA, when SkyWest bailed out the bankrupt DL with several hundred million cash for ASA? I agree that was the start of DL b$tchslapping its subcontractors, but it appears to me that Jerry was not clever, in fact it looks like he got taken to the cleaners.
Or you could be cynical and say that Jerry is doing just fine, he just threw his pilots under the bus in order to make the deal.
I could be wrong, but wasn't the "2nd lowest cost at some future point" clause agreed to when SkyWest and Delta signed the major 15-year CPA, when SkyWest bailed out the bankrupt DL with several hundred million cash for ASA?
That and Jerry was smart enough to have Delta throw some ATL Gates in the mix and no extra charge. I guess if Jerry wanted to fight back, he'd just charge Delta more to use his gates in ATL.
Yup, and it appears they've worked out a long range plan
Seriously, I would vote no. The game is about to be changed - big time. We don't really know how, or to what extent, yet. But, I'm betting it will be severely in pilots' favor.
Either way, my guess is the ERJs are soon gone. To be replaced? By what? E175/190s? I don't know, but the "narrow-body" jungle jets are outta here. The 50-seat CRJs will only be around to satisfy scope provisions.
Regionals, however, aren't going away anytime soon. I doesn't make economic sense. That pilot pay is a huge factor in operating costs is utter BS. Not satisfied that there partners might be profitable, main line partners are squeezing regionals to boost their own profits. But taking any more out of labor costs is unsustainable. No reason to bid on contracts with no profit. And, you can't fulfill contracts with no pilots. Small jets cannot be run as efficiently by main line carriers.
The only reason majors will absorb regional feed into their ranks is to shore up their own pilot availability. But, will main line ALPA groups stoop to allow smaller jets at a "C-scale" - this time? Or, will history repeat itself while the regional model (and pilots) get blamed for all the woes of the profession?
Yup, and it appears they've worked out a long range plan