JungleJett
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2004
- Posts
- 1,111
The answer to the first question:
Labor Union: an organization of workers formed for the purpose of advancing its members' interests in respect to wages, benefits, and working conditions.
Why go back decades? While ALPA made headway decades ago, how have they done in the past decade? You cannot rest on "Look what we did back in the 50's," when someone is asking about how things are today. As for your last statement, you have ZERO proof of that. Do you think pilots enjoy a just wage scale and have a tremendous QOL today...not 50 years ago? Is the membership satisfied with the way things are today?
How has ALPA reduced the impact of bankruptcy on the average line pilot?
You think? Have you read the papers? Maybe you should put down the ALPA propaganda and read the papers...or watch the news. And give some examples of "Taking it Back." is working.
The membership? Was that the same membership that spoke its mind when polled about age 65 and then ignored? Or was that a different membership? I remember the poll questions quite well. They were tilted towards Prater and the other old guys agenda's. I know a couple of people who were on the panel and they saw things differently than you do...and they were there. Recommendations were
made...and ignored.
Again, what are YOU doing to fix ALPA and in your opinion what is wrong with ALPA? Has ALPA been effective is stopping the slide of this profession over the past decade?
Hey Fubi...I would much rather be a pig than a zombie.
Labor Union: an organization of workers formed for the purpose of advancing its members' interests in respect to wages, benefits, and working conditions.
The past decade? Why are you limiting it? Why not look at ALPA's entire history to determine what ALPA has done for this profession? You would make a fraction of what you currently do and have a horrendous qualify of life were it not for ALPA.
Why go back decades? While ALPA made headway decades ago, how have they done in the past decade? You cannot rest on "Look what we did back in the 50's," when someone is asking about how things are today. As for your last statement, you have ZERO proof of that. Do you think pilots enjoy a just wage scale and have a tremendous QOL today...not 50 years ago? Is the membership satisfied with the way things are today?
You should read Flying the Line for some good answers to that question. As far as what they've done recently, ALPA has reduced the impact that bankruptcy could have had on our profession. Were it not for ALPA, the profession would be in far worse shape today.
How has ALPA reduced the impact of bankruptcy on the average line pilot?
Second, Captain Prater's plan is on track to produce real dividends. I think the next bargaining cycle is going to produce some great contract.
You think? Have you read the papers? Maybe you should put down the ALPA propaganda and read the papers...or watch the news. And give some examples of "Taking it Back." is working.
Both the membership and the BRP advised that the policy be modified if it became clear that Age 65 was inevitable. It was, and ALPA acted accordingly, providing a slew of protections in the Act.
The membership? Was that the same membership that spoke its mind when polled about age 65 and then ignored? Or was that a different membership? I remember the poll questions quite well. They were tilted towards Prater and the other old guys agenda's. I know a couple of people who were on the panel and they saw things differently than you do...and they were there. Recommendations were
made...and ignored.
Again, what are YOU doing to fix ALPA and in your opinion what is wrong with ALPA? Has ALPA been effective is stopping the slide of this profession over the past decade?
Hey Fubi...I would much rather be a pig than a zombie.