Rez O. Lewshun
Save the Profession
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2004
- Posts
- 13,422
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
However, your yardstick is to expect ALPA to be an individual bargaining agent for your interest, when in reality ALPA negotiates via the profession for collective bargaining interests...
2300+ former TWA pilots would differ in what you claim is ALPA's primary goal. ALPA will negotiate (or not negotiate if it represents a better position) what's best for ALPA...if your airline's pilots happen to be somehow on the coattails of that, then you're lucky. If not, then you don't meet the purpose of the union's goal, which is collecting more dues.
http://www.twapilot.org/TWA vs. ALPA Documents/Lee Seham Report.pdf
stlflyguy
That is an interesting document. I'm about 1/2 way through it and will probably finish reading it tonight. Obviously, it's very nature is biased toward the side of the Plantiffs. Do you have ALPA's response (I don't know what the legal term is) to the Bensel vs. ALPA action so that one can learn about both sides of the issue?
Alpa sux and so does Mesa
M
That is an interesting document. I'm about 1/2 way through it and will probably finish reading it tonight. Obviously, it's very nature is biased toward the side of the Plantiffs. Do you have ALPA's response (I don't know what the legal term is) to the Bensel vs. ALPA action so that one can learn about both sides of the issue?
Do you have ALPA's response (I don't know what the legal term is) to the Bensel vs. ALPA action so that one can learn about both sides of the issue?
No Solution--excuse me--Rez O. Lewshun claims that there's bias in the reports. If there was then ALPA would have no issue at arguing the merits of the report. Instead, the report--and two others by other experts--state where ALPA should have acted and failed to do so.
ALPA's large enough that there are very few unencumbered lawyers that practice the RLA that don't work for them.
What Rez also can't get over is that expert witnesses have a right to be compensated for their time. (http://www.benchmarkinstitute.org/t_by_t/expert/index.htm). ALPA could go and hire (well, could have) the very same expert witnesses as a preemptive action to the TWA pilots, but they didn't have the forethought to do so.
ALPA will have the opportunity to present a rebuttal, as would be normal procedure. Ask ALPA what their response is...after all No Solution says you should get involved.
Hey, the suit's only for $1.2B. ALPA can afford it right?
stlflyguy
Well, Rez is right. It's a compensated expert witness for the TWA guys. That, by definition, is biased. I'm not saying the expert witness is right or wrong as I read the whole document and haven't a clue. But as an interested by-stander, I certainly wouldn't formulate my opinion on a case such as this by reading a document produced by an expert witness hired by the Plantiffs! That's why I asked if you had the response to the original Bensel v. ALPA case. I guess you don't?
Offhand, no. Perhaps ALPA can provide you a copy?
ALPA is also afforded the same opportunity to use expert witnesses. Ask them if they will.
stlflyguy
Sounds like a bunch of angry FOs. No real power. Lots of fluff. In other words, USAPA...
Good luck.
M
Or they send the AIB to Buffalo when your pilot group experiences a plane crash a month after you vote them on the property.
I'll be the Colgan pilot group is pretty glad they voted ALPA today.
Seriously...and ALPA will be the only AIB on scene?
The only AIB that cares about protecting the deceased pilots, yes.
Seriously...and ALPA will be the only AIB on scene?
Using tragedy to prove a point...nice work.