Yeah, message received. Any other helpful opinions about how I oughtn't offer an opinion of what people say will receive yet another raised eyebrow and be cheerfully disregarded as glaringly hilarious.
Incidently, for those suffering from reading comprehension problems, it might help to re-read my original post.
Edit: FN FAL: as I said, my concern isn't about this joker killing himself. On the other hand, I spend a lot of time cruising IFR at low altitude in a non-turbo piston, sometimes non-radar. What if, instead of running in to a mountain, this jackhole runs in to me? THEN is it my business? Seems a little late. Anyway, the conversation inspired the question, but as I point out above, I have no intention of narking on anyone, ever, although I wouldn't blame someone if they did in a situation like this (were it possible, which I submit you're probably right about...it's not). Enforcement issues aside, the conversation was quite loud, and I'm 100% certain of what I heard. Other awesome topics included how ADFs are "worthless", VORs are "hard to figure out", why people use anything other than GPS, how to pretend you're instrument rated, how high you can REALLY fly without oxygen, the good ole days of flying for years without any license whatsoever, and assorted other swinging-dick retarded good ole boy bull********************.
Anyway. I obviously failed to communicate very well the first time, so let me try again. My interest is in how FSDOs operate. I.E. when a FSDO decides to "go after" a guy, how do they arrive at this decision? If you like, you can suspect me of being someone planning to get away with something illegal myself, which given the nature of the question would maybe be believable (although I'm not). I don't see where it makes any sense to criticize me based on the premises of the question, though.