Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

What does it take to get the Feds attention?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Rip Vanwinkle

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 23, 2006
Posts
96
There's some guy sitting two tables down bragging to his buddy about how he flies VFR through IMC all the time and giving him helpful hints about what to say to controllers. Now, personally, I don't care whether he kills his own dumb self, but what about the guy (say, me, for example) he runs in to and kills? So between fantasies of beating his good ole boy head in to the table, I started to idly wonder..."What DOES it take to get the Feds to check someone?" It's a purely theoretical question...I'm not a rat and I don't know this guy from Adam...but I'm curious nonetheless.
 
Rip Vanwinkle said:
There's some guy sitting two tables down bragging to his buddy about how he flies VFR through IMC all the time and giving him helpful hints about what to say to controllers. Now, personally, I don't care whether he kills his own dumb self, but what about the guy (say, me, for example) he runs in to and kills? So between fantasies of beating his good ole boy head in to the table, I started to idly wonder..."What DOES it take to get the Feds to check someone?" It's a purely theoretical question...I'm not a rat and I don't know this guy from Adam...but I'm curious nonetheless.
I'd say mind your own business, you probably can't tell what it is you're hearing anyway.
 
Rip Vanwinkle said:
I'd say the same to you.
You'd say that you would mind your own business?

I say mind your own business for several reasons. First, the feds are going to assume that you don't know what you are hearing and call your story "hear-say". So they have already pre-disposed that you probably don't know what you heard.

Second, who cares? Screw them, Let the both of them wind up in the funny papers. The way I look at it, people like that give me something to read in the morning when I dial in the news on my internet.
 
Yeah, message received. Any other helpful opinions about how I oughtn't offer an opinion of what people say will receive yet another raised eyebrow and be cheerfully disregarded as glaringly hilarious.

Incidently, for those suffering from reading comprehension problems, it might help to re-read my original post.


Edit: FN FAL: as I said, my concern isn't about this joker killing himself. On the other hand, I spend a lot of time cruising IFR at low altitude in a non-turbo piston, sometimes non-radar. What if, instead of running in to a mountain, this jackhole runs in to me? THEN is it my business? Seems a little late. Anyway, the conversation inspired the question, but as I point out above, I have no intention of narking on anyone, ever, although I wouldn't blame someone if they did in a situation like this (were it possible, which I submit you're probably right about...it's not). Enforcement issues aside, the conversation was quite loud, and I'm 100% certain of what I heard. Other awesome topics included how ADFs are "worthless", VORs are "hard to figure out", why people use anything other than GPS, how to pretend you're instrument rated, how high you can REALLY fly without oxygen, the good ole days of flying for years without any license whatsoever, and assorted other swinging-dick retarded good ole boy bull********************.

Anyway. I obviously failed to communicate very well the first time, so let me try again. My interest is in how FSDOs operate. I.E. when a FSDO decides to "go after" a guy, how do they arrive at this decision? If you like, you can suspect me of being someone planning to get away with something illegal myself, which given the nature of the question would maybe be believable (although I'm not). I don't see where it makes any sense to criticize me based on the premises of the question, though.
 
Last edited:
Rip Vanwinkle said:
There's some guy sitting two tables down bragging to his buddy about how he flies VFR through IMC all the time and giving him helpful hints about what to say to controllers. Now, personally, I don't care whether he kills his own dumb self, but what about the guy (say, me, for example) he runs in to and kills? So between fantasies of beating his good ole boy head in to the table, I started to idly wonder..."What DOES it take to get the Feds to check someone?" It's a purely theoretical question...I'm not a rat and I don't know this guy from Adam...but I'm curious nonetheless.

One thing to keep in mind is that there are certain times when you can legally fly in IMC conditions under Visual Flight Rules... not necessarily prudent or smart, but perfectly legal.
 
Rip Vanwinkle said:
Yeah, message received. Any other helpful opinions about how I oughtn't offer an opinion of what people say will receive yet another raised eyebrow and be cheerfully disregarded as glaringly hilarious.

Incidently, for those suffering from reading comprehension problems, it might help to re-read my original post.
You know the number to fsdo, give em a call and tell em what you heard. I bet when you get off the phone with them, you could look up the word "chagrin" at merriam-websters and that's what you'll be experiencing.
 
mcjohn said:
Care to elaborate? Are you just talking about SVFR?
You can fly in IMC conditions outside of controlled airspace with no IFR flight plan, so long as the pilot is IFR rated and the aircraft meets IFR requirements. In which case, there is no talking to controllers, unless you just want to tell them "hi!"
 

Latest resources

Back
Top