Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

What do you think will happen to ASA?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

av8er2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Posts
353
Can anyone indicate anything that is positive about ASA's future?

I personally am beginning to think there is a plan to really shrink ASA. They are stalling big time.
 
I think that Delta has negotiated an opportunity to exchange some CRJ200's for CRJ900's. It might be that certain 200's were leased by Comair to SkyWest Inc., which are being operated (mostly) at ASA. Some of these airplanes are very cheap due to the bankruptcy negotiations. A Comair style exchange is likely. But, SkyWest will probably get the choice as to where to operate these jets.

Source for information are this month's feature article on SkyWest in Airliners' (I think was the name of the magazine), the C Concourse re-re-redesign with jetways, SkyWest's ATL base, recent events at Comair and management comments.

The airplanes will be held out as yet another carrot to dangle in front of the ASA pilots. The stick will be the ever present threat to replace ASA as SkyWest and the others can. Management will say the future of ASA is in the pilots' hands.

I think ASA has a future, regardless of management threats. But there is the very real possiblility that it is a smaller future if ALPA does not get pragmatic and really focus on scope.

P.S. I just read our President's update on negotiations which was pretty specific on scope. The ASA CNC made a very reasonable request to lock in current block percentages and management rejected it out of hand. I'm glad the CNC made their proposal and support them in sticking to their principled position on this critical negotiation.
 
Last edited:
We are going to get 900's. I repeat....we are going to get 900's.

...as soon as the contract is done. There is already a rate negotiated for them (same as the 700 ). I suspect we will begin swapping the 200's for 700's and 900's once the contract is done. Like Fin's said, it will be a carrot to get the contract done. Management doesn't want 200's anymore. The future is the 70-100 seat range.

Bottom line....ASA isn't going away.
 
i agree fins that's it's about time they pushed for scope.

but it will never be agreed to with the other demands on pay for the 200/700, full backpay and profit share from inc. verse asa. alpa is still cherry-picking.

you cant within reason expect to dramatically increase costs - and demand future growth. why and how would skywest inc. ever agree to that?


the company is now offering skywest 200 pay - take it with some cola.

take the 700 pay as offered by the company with some cola.

take existing asa profit share.

push for more money in the signing bonus - that's a one time hit on inc.

realistic scope - tough one but achievable with other requests

get er done.
 
It is always darkest before the dawn early light. Most thought that Comair was in the grave and they are know getting the 900s with big seats in the front. The life cycle for the 200s are coming to an end and we will be swapping them out for 900s as well after we ink a deal. This is not the time for a token contract. It is only for ~3+ years or something like that.
 
Without leverage, this place is going to get much smaller. Each day that passes improves the company's position for transfering ASA flying. Our replacements are setting up domociles in ATL as we speak.

I know . I know. That's why we need scope. Folks it's too late for scope to save this place. They will either wait us out on the contract or circumvent whatever scope is agreed upon.

Jeger
 
It is time we get this thing done. We should take the rate they offered us on the 200 with cola. Take the rate on the 700. I believe we then will see the 200 start to go away being replaced by the 700/900 and those of us coming off the 200 will get a raise. Push for as much scope as possible, as much retro or signing bonus as possible, and lets send this thing out for a dang vote to see what happens. This is not the time to push for industry leading or even close. With all these carriers in ATL now, we have lost a good portion of our leverage.

Lets sign the thing, let 3 yrs go by, and see where Republic, Chitaqua, Republic, etc... are at in there negotiations or what rates they have then.

Just my thoughts.
 
It is time we get this thing done. We should take the rate they offered us on the 200 with cola. Take the rate on the 700. I believe we then will see the 200 start to go away being replaced by the 700/900 and those of us coming off the 200 will get a raise. Push for as much scope as possible, as much retro or signing bonus as possible, and lets send this thing out for a dang vote to see what happens. This is not the time to push for industry leading or even close. With all these carriers in ATL now, we have lost a good portion of our leverage.

Lets sign the thing, let 3 yrs go by, and see where Republic, Chitaqua, Republic, etc... are at in there negotiations or what rates they have then.

Just my thoughts.

I couldn't agree with you more.
 
I just read the company memo, and just as many thought.....scope costs something, and our CNC has not been willing to address that. Now, I don't blame them, they are doing what the pilot group wants. The expectations are a bit unreasonable for many at ASA. (Flames expected) We want the pay rates, the bonus plan, the full retro AND the binding scope. The company memo says it all. They cannot agree to the scope, and all of the other requests. The rub is this. They are maybe willing to give all the other goodies, but cant agree to the scope, see, because they will then need to transfer aircraft because ASA will have out priced themselves. Idle threat? I don't know. But, many say that the scope costs you something. The company can agree to protect your job if you agree to a cost effective contract. (See: Mesa, CHQ, Eagle) We need to decide, and soon, what we want. The jobs, security and maybe growth......or the top pay, full retro and bonus plan. Once we decide, this can get done! We, IMHO, can't be fighting for both. It just has never worked that way in this industry, and we just don't have the leverage now that Skywest owns us and can use the whipsaw tactics, and Delta keeps futher diluting the DCI product in ATL. I think the direction we need to take is clear.

Flame away!
 
Get 'R DONE-DAMMIT!

I agree with many points of the previous post. You need to have a balance between what you want and what you need. Nothing comes for free. I think we should get something soon. Just imagine how much leverage we will lose if another hurricane hits and fuel goes insane. We are losing a lot of steam here, we are taking a big risk by going on and on like this. If an economic downturn of any kind hits, the company will exploit it and stick it right in our BL!
-J
 

Latest resources

Back
Top