NEDude
yada yada yada
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2001
- Posts
- 1,611
So are you blaming the pilots at VX for driving wages down? Or are you blaming other factors like increased competition and various online ticket vendors?
Last edited:
Welcome to Flightinfo.com
- Register now and join the discussion
- Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
- Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
- Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
- Share the passion for aviation
- Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun
Virgin America 2Q loss $31.7 million
- Thread starter ackattacker
- Start date
- Watchers 30
Welcome to Flightinfo.com
- Register now and join the discussion
- Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
- Invite your friends
- Share the passion of aviation
- Friendliest aviation community on the web
So are you blaming the pilots at VX for driving wages down? Or are you blaming other factors like increased competition and various online ticket vendors?
Chairman
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2002
- Posts
- 401
NEDude
yada yada yada
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2001
- Posts
- 1,611
Hmm, upon further checking Mr "Your're Undercutting" relief tube is a captain for that industry leading airline known as Republic. From an earlier post of his:
"16 off. Home 24 nights out of the month and home for dinner 20 nights of the month. most weekends off. But live in base, senior rsv RAH.
Sorry for BB trying to take over the world. I wish all we flew were 34 seat props and had mainline to look forward to. " - January 28, 2009.
He has also taken issue with those who blame pilots groups for low wages:
"I love people who blame pilot groups and not $29 airfares for the way this industry is."- January 23, 2009.
So a Republic pilot gets on here and despite prior pronouncements against those who blame pilot groups for low wages, and blames VX pilots for undercutting.
relief tube - I invite you to come out to our crew room in SFO, while in your RAH uniform, and tell the VX pilots how we are undercutting the industry. I will make sure the several dozen ex-Midwest guys who are here will be in attendance to hear your speech....
redflyer65
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2004
- Posts
- 4,456
Bri,
I'm glad your current rate is above those carriers, but let's take a closer look....
USAir and United - You're comparing yourself to bankrupt contracts. That's a horrible arguement.
American - They don't have any 319/320's, so I don't think you want to compare yourself to there 737 rates, if you do...they win.
Hawaiian - They pay more for their 717 than for your Airbus rates.
Sun Country - Bankruptcy contract yet again.
Spirit - Pays marginally better.
Allegiant - Here we go. Your payrates are almost exactly equal to Allegiant. Almost dollar for dollar. I'm not sure your going to win any arguements talking about equallying Allegiant pay.
You work for a BILLIONAIRE, but he pays you less than Spirit's Baldanza. Not a strong arguement.
Redflyer,
It's not my fault they are all on bankruptcy contracts. My rates over the next few years are higher than those others in my post, so how can I be undercutting them? Some of them we are quite a bit higher (almost 25%). I never exclaimed we are the best paid pilots on the planet. I am just saying that calling us undercutters and Walmart wages is way out of line. Also, I am not sure what being owned by a billionaire has to do with anything. He might be a billionaire, but that doesn't mean he can just write blank checks to pay people what they want. Obviously he sinks enouh money into this place just keeping it going at this point (which I am grateful for). Don't make me call on the general to talk about what happened when the almighty SWA started
.
It's not my fault they are all on bankruptcy contracts. My rates over the next few years are higher than those others in my post, so how can I be undercutting them? Some of them we are quite a bit higher (almost 25%). I never exclaimed we are the best paid pilots on the planet. I am just saying that calling us undercutters and Walmart wages is way out of line. Also, I am not sure what being owned by a billionaire has to do with anything. He might be a billionaire, but that doesn't mean he can just write blank checks to pay people what they want. Obviously he sinks enouh money into this place just keeping it going at this point (which I am grateful for). Don't make me call on the general to talk about what happened when the almighty SWA started
.
Last edited:
NEDude
yada yada yada
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2001
- Posts
- 1,611
Interesting that a Southwest guy would look down his nose at the pay rates of any other airline. You are either truly ignorant of your own airlines past, or you subjectively justify your own airlines actions while looking down at others for doing the same thing. So tell me Mr. Southwest, are you ignorant or a hypocrite?
But those bankrupt contracts were already in place when VA started flying in 2007, meaning, that was the standard against which other airlines would peg against. In case you haven't noticed, launching an airline in this industry in 2007 wasn't the best considering the economy tanked. But the
Get with the program, American has already posted its A319 payrates on APC, management imposed bankruptcy rate. And yes, they are lower than VAs.
Maybe he's referring to first year pay, which is higher at VA than Hawaiian.
Even then, Sun Country is way bottom barrel. And, they were already in their BK-contract when VA came about in 2007.
Hardly pays better. Their management is so militant, they wanted contract concessions in order to pay for continued use of KCM.
No it isn't. VX pay is about 2-3 dollars higher per year for any given longevity.
Not true. Again, compare apples to apples, not oranges. A Feb 2010 guy at Spirit is still a FO, whereas at VX he's a Captain. Spirit's Baldanza is such a cheap azz he wants contract concessions to get KCM on board. Pay-wise, it's a wash (close enough), years 1, 3, and 4 for FOs are higher pay at VX than Spirit, and for Captains, years 1-7 are much higher at VX than Spirit.
Seriously though, this is coming from a guy at SWA? Obviously you were hired post 9/11 at SWA, but lets not forget SWA's pay history from prior to 9/11.
Last edited:
Tomct
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2004
- Posts
- 2,062
Jetjockey
Stay thirsty my friends
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2002
- Posts
- 1,492
Just LOVE listening to all these "so called" financial experts talk about how we won't be around in a year......UM, Ya'll have been saying that for the last 5 years. STILL HERE!! Here is an idea, you just worry about your airlines and your problems and let us worry about ours. Nuff Said!
I used to hear that rationale at Midwest Express. Don't need to be a "financial expert" to see the company is bleeding money, and is unprofitable. I do not wish ANY ill will upon any pilot or company. It's just you really have to wonder how many unprofitable quarters the company can endure.
They can theoretically endure forever as long as there are investors willing to fund the losses and provide working capital. So far there doesn't seem to be a shortage of new capital. Whoever is bankrolling VA seems to be willing to hang in there for the long haul believing that at some point the company will be viable and they will be able to cash out their equity. It would appear to be an unproductive use of investment capital to me but obviously the folks with the money see something here or they would pull the plug and take the losses before they get to be much larger.
It's going to be another tough winter for this company. I wish the folks who work there the best of luck, maybe things will start to turn around in the spring and next year will be the turning point.
ackattacker
Client 9
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2004
- Posts
- 2,125
They have been telling their investors that their losses were almost entirely due to the cost of growth. When they stop growing, (actually shrinking this winter), they need to show a profit. Which, IMHO, is doubtful.
The best comparison I can draw is Kingfisher airlines in India. Started at around the same time, bankrolled and led by a charismatic billionaire. First class service and brand new everything, sexiest flight attendants. Everyone thought they were destined for greatness, and could never fail because they were bankrolled by a multi-billionaire. Never turned a profit, started to have trouble getting new financing to pay the bills for their aircraft. Parked some aircraft and then weren't able to pay their salaries. $1.5 billion in debt. Looks like their doors are now shut for good as the Indian regulators are about to yank their certificate.
One trait of successful investors is that they are willing to throw in the towel and take the loss when an investment goes south before they throw too much good money after bad. They haven't thrown in the towel yet on VA so they must see something but the talk of a "major restructuring" is never good. In this industry I can't see what they can restructure that will make a difference unless they can try to become another Allegiant and find niche routes with minimal competition. There's only so many of those routes available. The next step may be going to the employees, vendors and lenders and start the carpet dance. It's tough for small companies that are not "too big to fail."
Share this page
Latest resources
-
-
-
-
-
AC 90-89C - Amateur-Built Aircraft and Ultralight Flight Testing HandbookAmateur-Built Aircraft and Ultralight Flight Testing Handbook
- Neal
- Updated:
