Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

VFR Flight Following Why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pilotyip
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 22

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

pilotyip

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 26, 2001
Posts
13,629
Observation while flying VFR in the mightly C-172 the other day. Approaching TOL from the south at 5,500' on a 50 mile visibility clear blue day, I thought I would advise TOL approach I was overflying their airspace at 5,500'. I could not get a word in edgewise, there must have been 10 VFR airplanes asking for VFR flight following. So I finally made the call and was told to "Standby and remain clear of class C airspace". That was cool I was doing it anyway. I continued to moniter the freq. The controller kept telling the VFR airplanes he had a VFR aircraft at 5,500' unconfirmed at xxo'clock, etc. He was overloaded, plus he handels the IFR handoff's at CRUXX intersection for traffic going in YIP and PTK. To the point, why is it on a beautiful VFR day pilots have to be talking to someone? Is not the beauty of flying VFR the escape from the constant chatter on the radios? Why do pilots seek to have VFR flight following?
 
pilotyip said:
Observation while flying VFR in the mightly C-172 the other day. Approaching TOL from the south at 5,500' on a 50 mile visibility clear blue day, I thought I would advise TOL approach I was overflying their airspace at 5,500'.

To the point, why is it on a beautiful VFR day pilots have to be talking to someone? Is not the beauty of flying VFR the escape from the constant chatter on the radios? Why do pilots seek to have VFR flight following?

I'm sorry - did you say you were flying VFR but felt the urge to talk to someone? Or is it only OTHER pilots that should get off the frequency, not you?

Yours is a valid question - but it seems you should be able to look to yourself and find an answer you can share with the rest of us.
 
pilotyip said:
Observation while flying VFR in the mightly C-172 the other day. Approaching TOL from the south at 5,500' on a 50 mile visibility clear blue day, I thought I would advise TOL approach I was overflying their airspace at 5,500'. I could not get a word in edgewise, there must have been 10 VFR airplanes asking for VFR flight following. So I finally made the call and was told to "Standby and remain clear of class C airspace". That was cool I was doing it anyway. I continued to moniter the freq. The controller kept telling the VFR airplanes he had a VFR aircraft at 5,500' unconfirmed at xxo'clock, etc. He was overloaded, plus he handels the IFR handoff's at CRUXX intersection for traffic going in YIP and PTK. To the point, why is it on a beautiful VFR day pilots have to be talking to someone? Is not the beauty of flying VFR the escape from the constant chatter on the radios? Why do pilots seek to have VFR flight following?

because its an extra set of eyes looking for aircraft along with yours.... and if there is an emergency your already talking to someone...
 
I always made my students get it, but I never got it for myself. Clear as mud?
 
I live in Ohio, and everytime I go up to TOL airspace they are overloaded with VFR flight following. I've never see it that bad any where else in Ohio or WV.

Which usually puts the controllers in a bad mood for any IFR traffic.

Was it a weekend with CAVU weather?
 
Our insurance at the school requires either a fligth plan or flight following whenever you go cross country. If I am doing a short hop for my side job, as mentioned before, to have an extra set of eyes and and I don't have to worry about one extra thing if I need to holler "MAYDAY!" (twisting up 121.5)
 
TiredOfTeaching said:
Our insurance at the school requires either a fligth plan or flight following whenever you go cross country. If I am doing a short hop for my side job, as mentioned before, to have an extra set of eyes and and I don't have to worry about one extra thing if I need to holler "MAYDAY!" (twisting up 121.5)
Flight following can be done in house by company...
 
Never mind flight following, I want to know why any of us bother to talk to anyone at all. I mean, all those pesky control towers and approach facilities and ARTCCs just get in the way and keep us from having the precious in-flight silence that we all deserve as strapping aviators. Some people say that it increases safety and our ability to prevent mid-air collisions, but I just don't buy it--we should be able to fly wherever and how ever we want. Screw public safety. If they can't avoid falling debris, that's their own effing problem. Oh sure, there will be a few "squares" down at the FAA who won't dig the "goose" philosophy, but I think it'll catch on eventually.

-Goose
 
Last edited:
I always had my students get flight following just so they had someone already keyed up to talk to in case something happened. Student pilots have a propensity for getting lost, so I always wanted them to have someone to talk to instead of searching around on their sectional trying to find the closest FSS repeater for a direction steer. If they've been talking to someone from the start of the cross country, then ATC already knows where they are and can help if they get lost.
 
I guess there is not a high confidence level in see and avoid.
 
pilotyip said:
I guess there is not a high confidence level in see and avoid.

No, there's not, because I was doing "see and avoid" when I noticed a flicker of movement out of the corner of my eye. I look to the right and see a light twin (about baron sized) in a 90 degree bank angle pulling away from me. I could see the stains on the underbelly. It lost at least 500 feet in that maneuver. Had the other pilot waited a fraction of a second longer, we both would have been fish bait (there was a river beneath us). Had I been using flight following, it probably wouldn't have happened.

So no, I don't have a high confidence level in see and avoid. I'll take every aid I can get to help me out.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom