waveflyer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2005
- Posts
- 10,005
Bruce Lakefield USAirways CEO put together the outside investment for the transaction.
who cares?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bruce Lakefield USAirways CEO put together the outside investment for the transaction.
I submit that no other union would've or could've achieved anything substantially better. The economy, the government, bankruptcy court, and the airline's financials are what caused the terrible concessions of the last seven years.
I never said that another union was the answer or that they would have done better. You're arguing something that I am not. I was merely responding to a question that PCL asked with a lot of background info so that he might understand the underlying frustration. Much of what was done by UA ALPA to the furloughees was done before BK. They gave up on scope and furlough grievances in Nov. 2001, 11 mos. before BK with full knowledge of both how many SJ's were coming and that management had publicly stated that it wanted to furlough 20% of the pilots.
In other words, dumping ALPA will yield no benefits. When the euphoria of the short-sighted USAir East pilots wears off this will become painfully obvious. A new scapegoat will need to be found. My guess is it will be USAPA.
You are right. In UA's case it was a terrible failure of union leadership combined with a pilot group who just wasn't prepared for what was happening and needed strong leadership to show the way. Only 9% of UA's pilot group in 2001 was around for 1985, less for the last furloughs in the 1978 and the 'Blue Skies' deal in the early 80's.
As far as UsAir East goes, they've never been happy with anything as a group and likely never will be. The big mistake was Doug Parker and his team not realizing what they were biting off way more than they could chew and to some extent early on the feeling of most UsWest pilots that they could ultimately deal with the East rationally when all evidence and history of who they were both dealing with was right in front of them.
http://cf.alpa.org/mec/aaa/docs/newmectoday/arc/airwaves/aw0203/merge0302.pdf
http://cf.alpa.org/mec/aaa/docs/newmectoday/arc/airwaves/aw0102/merger0201.pdf
http://cf.alpa.org/mec/aaa/docs/newmectoday/arc/airwaves/aw0012/merge1200.pdf
http://cf.alpa.org/mec/aaa/docs/newmectoday/arc/airwaves/aw0010/merg1000.pdf
In the end, I think you will be right, USAPA will be yet another scapegoat. USAPA won't work, it won't change the list and will ultimately fail under the weight of unrealistic expectations, lack of resources, and now two groups of pilots who will never be satisfied with what their 'leadership' comes up with. It's ultimate legacy will likely be determined by how much longer that they can drag out negotiations on a contract so that the two carriers still remain separate in an unofficial fence situation. Barring another merger to 'speed' things up, it seems like this will ultimately end up with Airways rejoining ALPA after USAPA runs out steam with their fruitless efforts and the majority of the East decides the fences have been up long enough.
Again, you do not understand. You are talking a COMPLETELY different issue than I am.
I am referring to the amount of sacrifice across the pilot group, amount of junior sacrifice vs senior sacrifice. You are referring to the total sacrifice extracted from the entire pilot group.
As a former TWAer, I am surprised that you are having difficulties with that concept.
To keep it simple: think in terms of distribution of sacrifice across the seniority list. Did all pilots share equally in sacrifices and division of crumbs thrown the union's way? I'm not talking about the total sum of concessions extracted from the entire pilot population. One only needs look at the widebody vs narrowbody work rules out of C2003.
The problem is.... how do we get the senior guys to give up thier boats so the junior guys can take care of their family?
Agreed-
The pilot seniority lists in our industry are a mirror of our culture and economic distribution: the rich get richer while the poor get poorer.
A senior pilot making $175/hour.
A new hire making $35-45 hour.
$20/hr from the senior pilot given to the new hire. The senior pilot can easily make adjustments, and the $20 would be a godsend to the new hire pilot.
The divisiveness, disdain and animosity amongts us can be reduced if we create a bit more economic equality amongts us. Because we always talk about how the senior guys screw the junior guys.
In europe this is so. Senior pilots work every other Christmas.
A story I heard a few weeks ago: At American a DC-10 FE was getting furloughed flying his last trips. The CA and FO were talking about thier toys as the CA pulled out pictures of his boat named "Open Time".
The problem is.... how do we get the senior guys to give up thier boats so the junior guys can take care of their family?
...
IMO, the European airline system is better....They also pay the same across all aircraft.....It is actually a much better system...the young folks get to do the international stuff and the older people get to stay in the same time zone.....Win-win.....
Now as to the "how"...The only way to convince the top is if they feel their "boat" will be threatened if we don't change.....I don't think anything else will work.....
Careful... what I have posted is a slippery slope into socialism. RALPs or Republican Air Line Pilots might not stand for it.... What I posted counters the American motto of "Up yours, I got mine"
Easy, you the junior guy must live within your means until you become that Senior guy.
Then you can be on top and telling the guy your flying with all about your Boat.
Okay. However, by the time many of us become the senior guy, being the senior guy won't pay nearly as well as it did. Which brings us right back into "living within our means."
Caspian27 said:And I Agree with both Rez and Joe on this. Maybe I should go buy a lottery ticket...
It isn't a "brotherhood." It's a bunch of people looking out for themselves; which is all too common these days it seems.
The union problem philosophically is that to be truly unified, every single person of a group needs to want the exact same things, or be willing to make compromises for the greater good. But no union is completely unified...there are always divisions between senior/junior, bases, equipment, etc. Also because what you want changes over time as you gain more longevity and pay. In the end, it all comes back to self. Are you going to look out just for yourself now? Or do you realize that by giving a little and making other parts of your group happy, it's going to come back to you and help you out later.
Settle down Dr. Phil. USAPA guys are looking out for #1. You are right about that. Get f'd with enough, give something else a shot (USAPA). Why wouldn't they (except for the senior sell-outs)?
Okay. However, by the time many of us become the senior guy, being the senior guy won't pay nearly as well as it did. Which brings us right back into "living within our means."
And I Agree with both Rez and Joe on this. Maybe I should go buy a lottery ticket...
Marry someone Rich!!!! Then flying can just be a hobby that your spouse supports!
Easy, you the junior guy must live within your means until you become that Senior guy.
Then you can be on top and telling the guy your flying with all about your Boat.