USAPA resignation

[Turtle21]

Not Ripe is a smackdown? Did you even read the brief? The 9 also told USAPA to proceed with caution and fairness, if they didn't DFR2 was coming and was going to be ripe. Did they listen? Guess what coming around the corner?

And just how did the 9th tell them to proceed? Yes by negotiating the seniority proposal with the company.

 

[olympus593]

And just how did the 9th tell them to proceed? Yes by negotiating the seniority proposal with the company.

No they did not, by fairly representing both side...Having it your way is not it... DFR part 2 is coming your way!

 

[BeCareful!]

They also opined what fair was, and Nic wasn't mentioned there. What they said was to stay within a "wide range of reasonableness." Let's see, AFA....doh.....IAM.....doh....every other group....doh. Somehow, somewhere in all of those done-deal integrations there must be a shred of "wide range of reasonableness."
Nah...probably not. I'm sure you guys will "set the record straight" in my absence though (i just can't live on the Internet like y'all do.)

 

[Guppiedriver]

I'm sure you guys will "set the record straight" in my absence though (i just can't live on the Internet like y'all do.)

Says the guy with 789 posts.

 

[TWA Dude]

They also opined what fair was, and Nic wasn't mentioned there.

Whatever they opined is irrelevant. The Nic wasn't on trial. It was a DFR trial and USAPA lost. $eham tells you the case has disappeared yet the company files a suit clearly indicating it hasn't. $eham is like the mythological Sirens luring the USAPA ship into jagged rocks. Rocks hurt, by the way.