Quick Facts #9 Hosted on Unbiased Facts
June 23, 2009
We Fully Expected to Lose The DFR Lawsuit We Said Could Never Happen
USAPA’s Willful Misrepresentations
USAPA Website Rumor Control Section (Prior to the NMB Representation Election)
Question - “I heard that if USAPA renegotiates the list using DOH, it will be grounds
for a DFR lawsuit."
Answer - “FALSE”.
Source:
http://1.usairlinepilots.org/members-only/old_files/rumor_control.htm (log in required)
USAPA Update – May 13, 2009
“The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and, if necessary, the United States Supreme Court,
are the appropriate places for the law to be truly vetted. While USAPA would have, of
course, preferred to prevail in the current setting (allowing the pilot group to come
together and work towards an improved contract), we fully expected and planned for
this contingency.”
Summary – Prior to the ALPA – USAPA NMB Representational election in a
Question and Answer Section USAPA stated that there would be no grounds for a DFR
lawsuit if USAPA attempts to renegotiate the seniority list using DOH. However,
following the unanimous 9-0 jury conviction finding USAPA guilty of DFR, USAPA
said, “we fully expected and planned for this contingency.”
Which comment is true? This wasn't just a little wrong – they were miles off. How
much more of this should the US Airways pilots continue to tolerate while the pilots in
the rest of this industry are making steady gains in pay, retirement, benefits and quality
of life?
June 23, 2009
We Fully Expected to Lose The DFR Lawsuit We Said Could Never Happen
USAPA’s Willful Misrepresentations
USAPA Website Rumor Control Section (Prior to the NMB Representation Election)
Question - “I heard that if USAPA renegotiates the list using DOH, it will be grounds
for a DFR lawsuit."
Answer - “FALSE”.
Source:
http://1.usairlinepilots.org/members-only/old_files/rumor_control.htm (log in required)
USAPA Update – May 13, 2009
“The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and, if necessary, the United States Supreme Court,
are the appropriate places for the law to be truly vetted. While USAPA would have, of
course, preferred to prevail in the current setting (allowing the pilot group to come
together and work towards an improved contract), we fully expected and planned for
this contingency.”
Summary – Prior to the ALPA – USAPA NMB Representational election in a
Question and Answer Section USAPA stated that there would be no grounds for a DFR
lawsuit if USAPA attempts to renegotiate the seniority list using DOH. However,
following the unanimous 9-0 jury conviction finding USAPA guilty of DFR, USAPA
said, “we fully expected and planned for this contingency.”
Which comment is true? This wasn't just a little wrong – they were miles off. How
much more of this should the US Airways pilots continue to tolerate while the pilots in
the rest of this industry are making steady gains in pay, retirement, benefits and quality
of life?