Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Usairways no more profit sharing?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Don't confuse my service to this country with this debate.
No, you served your country. However, your participation in the subjugation and prosecution of your fellow pilots in order to facilitate your personal gain not only forces you to forfeit the honor that goes with your former service, but it attempts to tar the other honorable persons you served with by association. That is why you have earned the label Semper Fail. And, in the eyes of many another term as well, which I will leave to the audience imagination.
 
A man of honor would never ever look at his family and say a man named nic says a bunch of youngsters are going to be my captains and make more than me so we have to cut back.
So when your child asks, "Did you give your word that you would abide by what was decided whether you like it or not?" you can tell them "Yes, but Daddies don't always have to tell the truth or live with the consequences of their decisions, especially if there are enough of us".

So the next question they should ask is, "Daddy, can I join a gang?"
 
No, you served your country. However, your participation in the subjugation and prosecution of your fellow pilots in order to facilitate your personal gain not only forces you to forfeit the honor that goes with your former service, but it attempts to tar the other honorable persons you served with by association. That is why you have earned the label Semper Fail. And, in the eyes of many another term as well, which I will leave to the audience imagination.

Are you serious? You're an absolute idiot.
 
Come on, now let's have answers. YOU WANT ANSWERS? YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH! Sorry couldn't resist you know Col. Jessup. You still have yet to tell me why you think 1700 west pilots should have to wait to get a raise I do sincerely feel bad that you guys are working under a crappy ALPA negotiated contract until a sufficient number of east pilots are satisfied that they have gorged we make less than you look at the rates themselves at the trough and, once sated are ready to walk away from the damage they have created.

Don't try to blame some "clerks" Really? I bet when 3000 people were killed on 911 Wolf and Gangwall (my clerks at the time) danced around the office high fiving because within seconds of the start of the attacks they knew they could breach the contract they had with us...that's some real integrity there and I believe your current clerk (you know the one who served time in jail for driving drunk and could have killed some one while doing) so would celebrate another attack on us. Real integrity there. Why do you like him so much Birdie? I say "clerks" not to insult you but to show I don't think they are much more than that. or ALPA an endless LOA come on? or the west I don't really blame you guys. I think most groups would have done exactly what you are doing. Waiting to cash in lottery winnings. or Nicolau an arbitrator is supposed to keep the ball rolling how did he do? or any one of the endless phalanx of boogiemen you guys trot out. Just make a convincing argument that might makes right even if it causes innocent west pilot's families to suffer. C'mon, it can't be that difficult.

We want some answers. So but not telling us what your definition of a windfall is means you don't know what it is or you think there should be windfalls for one side in a M/A?
 
Situational ethics. You're younger than I thought. But then again, you allowed Cleary to run your union without even the threat of recall, so maturity must not be your strong suit.

The SCOTUS heard your accusations about lying, thieving, dishonorable, integrity challenged scabs, and they told you to get the F out of their court room because you don't even have a case.

And you ran out of the courtroom screaming like a baby that can't have a candy bar at the grocery store check out. Now you are running down the street in your diapers to every neighbor's house to announce to the whole world that you are likely the only mature human left on the planet, and you are being oppressed by toddlers who are denying you your candy bar.

One of these days your obsession will spill out from behind that keyboard you pound away on and you will mouth off to another pilot, face face. And when you do you better damn well hope you have the good fortune of doing it to a Marine who has the honor and restraint not to waste his time kicking your diaper a$&.
 
One of these days your obsession will spill out from behind that keyboard you pound away on and you will mouth off to another pilot, face face. And when you do you better damn well hope you have the good fortune of doing it to a Marine who has the honor and restraint not to waste his time kicking your diaper a$&.

You're welcome to ride on my jumpseat anytime and try to reconcile honor and tyranny. Just because it's never been done before doesn't mean you shouldn't try. Heck before long we may end up doing a long 4-day together.

If you want to remain on this board and participate in the debate, you'll probably need to retract the veiled threats. They're ineffective and don't add anything productive.
 
You're welcome to ride on my jumpseat anytime and try to reconcile honor and tyranny. Just because it's never been done before doesn't mean you shouldn't try. Heck before long we may end up doing a long 4-day together.

If you want to remain on this board and participate in the debate, you'll probably need to retract the veiled threats. They're ineffective and don't add anything productive.

Awe come on Birdie there is no threat there I think he is suggesting that you're brave enough to say some pretty extreme things on an anonymous web board but face to face it might be differant.

We are at a stalemate here because no matter how many times you try to compare my service in the Marines to my civilian job will just have me repeat to that I firmly believe fighting that nic award is the honorable thing to do. Gotta go fly see ya.
 
You're welcome to ride on my jumpseat anytime and try to reconcile honor and tyranny. Just because it's never been done before doesn't mean you shouldn't try. Heck before long we may end up doing a long 4-day together.

If you want to remain on this board and participate in the debate, you'll probably need to retract the veiled threats. They're ineffective and don't add anything productive.

You still think this is about you and your accusations of tyranny :lol: . Man up and accept the fact that the SCOTUS already addressed that conversation, yet you want to ignore the court's instruction to STFU and come back when you have a case.

This is about you impugning a fellow pilot's integrity on a message board because you didn't like being shut out of the courts. And having falsely slandered a pilot, you then stepped off the ledge and slandered the entire Corps by association. You have lost it.

I jump on West metal all the time and all the crews find I am polite and cordial. None of them demand we talk about their victim status under tyrants. And as far as associations go, I don't project your persona onto the entire West pilot group. :lol:
 

Latest resources

Back
Top