Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

USAir 1549 CVR transcript

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I kissed Sully's picture this morning... I felt so much better! Thrust lever- TOGA = power.
Air France couldn't figure it out either one day at a little air show in Paris. It's those simple things in life that kinda bite ya. Anyone see Sully's broom???

Obviously no concept what the affect of damaged blades can have on a jet engine.
 
Obviously no concept what the affect of damaged blades can have on a jet engine.

Exactly!! an uncontained rotor burst just 1/2 mile from the runway would have resulted in a much different outcome.
Also interesting to note is that these MODERN power plants are FADEC controlled and protected. I suspect that even if the thrust levers had been taken to TOGA (against QRH procedure) FADEC would have commanded minimal, if any, additional fuel metering. This is required and part of engine certification, in order to avoid, well...An uncontained rotor burst....
 
Last edited:
How about opening the APU bleed (part of the QRH procedure) so that the engine could spin fast enough for the FADEC to allow additional fuel => thrust?
 
How about opening the APU bleed (part of the QRH procedure) so that the engine could spin fast enough for the FADEC to allow additional fuel => thrust?

If I recall, both motors were still producing thrust #1 @35% and #2 @21%. The flame was still lit. That's why the rat never deployed and full hydraulics were available.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom