Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

US Airways execs meet with Pilots

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

satpak77

Marriott Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2003
Posts
3,015
http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/sto...aders.html?cm_ven=YAHOO&cm_cat=FREE&cm_ite=NA

CHARLOTTE, N.C. (TheStreet) -- Top US Airways(LCC) executives met with the airline's pilot leaders Monday to discuss the state of merger talks with United(UAUA). "The purpose of the meeting was to once again underscore USAPA's willingness to work cooperatively with our company's management to facilitate any transaction that brings true value to all the potential stakeholders, including our pilots," said the US Airline Pilots Association in a brief statement. USAPA president Mike Cleary said the union will work with the carrier to "evaluate any potential transaction." The meeting included Cleary and union vice president Randy Mowrey, as well as US Airways CEO Doug Parker, President Scott Kirby and COO Robert Isom.
 
Wow, NIC hasn't even been implement, no single contract, and they are meeting to discuss a merger???

Incredible. But you're right, UAL will shove USAPA right up their crap hole, which is a good thing....
 
Yawn....old news. And what he says later about UAL pilots and their latest thinking about seniority seems to be true. I know of exactly zero UAL pilots who think a 2004 hire date should net you narrow body captain or widebody FO with a block.

Good luck with that ploy....
 
I don't know why many of you think we are all behind ALPA at UAL. Most of the narrowbody types that have flown under a different set of rules than the widebody will tell ALPA to kiss off given half a chance. I would vote independant union in a heart beat, As I have said before if United is the name that were to survive, all we got to do is remove the S from USAPA.
 
It's no shock that many at UAL are dissatisfied with ALPA. As I've said before, when times are bad nobody is happy with their union. Unions are a very convenient scapegoat, ie, why didn't they stop xxx from happening?

However, the obvious discontent with ALPA doesn't necessarily translate to voting in a new union. Calm, rational minds understand that changing to an independent union won't solve any problems. The USAir Easties should've known better but they let their emotions and misplaced trust in Seham lead them down the wrong path. For now I'm going to trust the UAL pilots not to make the same mistake.
 
It's no shock that many at UAL are dissatisfied with ALPA. As I've said before, when times are bad nobody is happy with their union. Unions are a very convenient scapegoat, ie, why didn't they stop xxx from happening?

However, the obvious discontent with ALPA doesn't necessarily translate to voting in a new union. Calm, rational minds understand that changing to an independent union won't solve any problems. The USAir Easties should've known better but they let their emotions and misplaced trust in Seham lead them down the wrong path. For now I'm going to trust the UAL pilots not to make the same mistake.

You are of course welcome to your opinion. I would choose to belong to a union that has my best interests, and only my, best interest in mind. ALPA gave that up when they decided to represent pilots that compete for the same flying as me. I am all for the RJ pilots getting as much pay as they can. I understand that is also in my favor however they, and I do not have to belong to the same union. An obvious conflict of interest.

As for trusting us?? I don't know. We will vote as best we can with our wallets.
 
Last edited:
Lemme ask you, IYO how has USAPA been working out for the US Airways pilots so far?
In my opinion they have been successful in protecting what they believe is theirs. I am aware that most of the west guys will argue they could have had a raise by now if they had merged, however there is no contractual raise big enough to cover the lost pay resulting in the loss of upgrades they would suffer with the nic. I am not making a political statement here that is simply math facts. Pilots vote with their wallets. This is why in my opinion a merger with USAir will not work with the nic in place. Though we would benefit short term, in the long run we are better off with DOH or longevity because of the age of the East pilots.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top